<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Joys of Geocoding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raincityguide.com/2006/01/10/the-joys-of-geocoding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/01/10/the-joys-of-geocoding/</link>
	<description>Seattle&#039;s Leading Resource for Real Estate Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:08:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Real Central VA - Tracking the Charlottesville and Central VA real estate market and more &#187; Geocoding public notices</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/01/10/the-joys-of-geocoding/#comment-9905</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Central VA - Tracking the Charlottesville and Central VA real estate market and more &#187; Geocoding public notices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=288#comment-9905</guid>
		<description>[...] Albemarle&#8217;s Zoning Notice search page is detailed, but they charge a separate fee for GIS data. The City of Charlottesville&#8217;s new website is terrible, but I finally got here. Fluvanna has a nice GIS implementation. Great post on geocoding at RCG [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Albemarle&#8217;s Zoning Notice search page is detailed, but they charge a separate fee for GIS data. The City of Charlottesville&#8217;s new website is terrible, but I finally got here. Fluvanna has a nice GIS implementation. Great post on geocoding at RCG [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/01/10/the-joys-of-geocoding/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=288#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>That was a great insight into the world of Geocoding.

I brought the point up because when searching GoogleEarth before and looking up houses of friends and family, I often noticed that some of the time it indentified one of the neighboring houses as the target property and thought it was a little odd.  

It&#039;s looking good though. Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a great insight into the world of Geocoding.</p>
<p>I brought the point up because when searching GoogleEarth before and looking up houses of friends and family, I often noticed that some of the time it indentified one of the neighboring houses as the target property and thought it was a little odd.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s looking good though. Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galen</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/01/10/the-joys-of-geocoding/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=288#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>Robbie, as a former GIS / GPS guy, I can tell you that good, post-processed GPS data like those companies (should?) use is good to the meter or so.  However, they don&#039;t type in each address - they divvy the block up into even sections and &quot;guess&quot; the address from that.  Part of what you&#039;re seeing with Google earth is also geo-referencing error on aerial imagery it&#039;s hard to get aerial photos of 3-d surfaces accurate to the meter; if you look at the space needle, it looks like it&#039;s leaning to the side.  This is because the airplane (yes, airplane!) was not directly over it when it took the picture.

I&#039;m guessing you&#039;re well aware of this, but most folks aren&#039;t.

So, you&#039;re right: no complaining people - those points are pretty close!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robbie, as a former GIS / GPS guy, I can tell you that good, post-processed GPS data like those companies (should?) use is good to the meter or so.  However, they don&#8217;t type in each address &#8211; they divvy the block up into even sections and &#8220;guess&#8221; the address from that.  Part of what you&#8217;re seeing with Google earth is also geo-referencing error on aerial imagery it&#8217;s hard to get aerial photos of 3-d surfaces accurate to the meter; if you look at the space needle, it looks like it&#8217;s leaning to the side.  This is because the airplane (yes, airplane!) was not directly over it when it took the picture.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;re well aware of this, but most folks aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So, you&#8217;re right: no complaining people &#8211; those points are pretty close!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
