<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should RCG Allow Anonymous Comments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/</link>
	<description>Seattle&#039;s Leading Resource for Real Estate Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:03:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337530</guid>
		<description>Jerry, 

Ardell and Rhonda summed things up pretty darn well... However, over the past two years, I&#039;ve actually implemented what I&#039;ll call &quot;option #5&quot;.  

In this option, the first thing I started doing is moderating the first comment left by someone (as defined by their email and/or name combination).  I did this mainly because I was tired of waking up in the morning to find that a new spam sites had gotten through the RCG spam filter... By simply moderating the first comment, spam comments haven&#039;t been seen on RCG in years!  

The 2nd thing I do is to offer a &quot;carrot&quot; to people who are willing to self-identify themselves via their Facebook profile.   If someone is willing to leave a comment under their Facebook identity, then the &quot;no follow&quot; associated with the link on their name is stripped away so that they can get some google juice from RCG. 

These two changes (i.e. option #5) seem to be working pretty darn well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, </p>
<p>Ardell and Rhonda summed things up pretty darn well&#8230; However, over the past two years, I&#8217;ve actually implemented what I&#8217;ll call &#8220;option #5&#8243;.  </p>
<p>In this option, the first thing I started doing is moderating the first comment left by someone (as defined by their email and/or name combination).  I did this mainly because I was tired of waking up in the morning to find that a new spam sites had gotten through the RCG spam filter&#8230; By simply moderating the first comment, spam comments haven&#8217;t been seen on RCG in years!  </p>
<p>The 2nd thing I do is to offer a &#8220;carrot&#8221; to people who are willing to self-identify themselves via their Facebook profile.   If someone is willing to leave a comment under their Facebook identity, then the &#8220;no follow&#8221; associated with the link on their name is stripped away so that they can get some google juice from RCG. </p>
<p>These two changes (i.e. option #5) seem to be working pretty darn well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda Porter</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337520</guid>
		<description>Jerry, welcome to Rain City Guide.   Many of our anonymous commenters are &quot;regulars&quot;...you&#039;ll get to know their personalities the more you read and converse with them.   Ardell&#039;s right...some of them cannot reveal who they really are because of their employment.   It&#039;s fun when one contacts you and says, &quot;Hello I&#039;m Joe, you know me as YadaYada on RCG&quot;.  

The Facebook feature that Dustin recently added prevents some anonymous commenting from taking place...we would prevent a lot of valuable dialogue if everyone was verified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, welcome to Rain City Guide.   Many of our anonymous commenters are &#8220;regulars&#8221;&#8230;you&#8217;ll get to know their personalities the more you read and converse with them.   Ardell&#8217;s right&#8230;some of them cannot reveal who they really are because of their employment.   It&#8217;s fun when one contacts you and says, &#8220;Hello I&#8217;m Joe, you know me as YadaYada on RCG&#8221;.  </p>
<p>The Facebook feature that Dustin recently added prevents some anonymous commenting from taking place&#8230;we would prevent a lot of valuable dialogue if everyone was verified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARDELL</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337517</link>
		<dc:creator>ARDELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337517</guid>
		<description>Jerry,

Many people prefer to be anonymous for good reason.  

1) They are sometimes commenting from work and the date and time stamps will show that they were here vs. working :)

2) One of our commenters stayed anonymous while he was home shopping, because he didn&#039;t want the agents to see what he was thinking while he was looking at houses.  It could give them an advantage when he made an offer.  As soon as he bought a house, he removed the anonymous moniker.

Many professionals want the commenters to not be anonymous, but what they want is more important because without readers...we are nothing but people talking to each other.  

Look at the Seattle Real Estate Professionals Blog and most often it is just the writers talking to one another...because they require registration.  They do not require that people use real names, but they do require registration, and they have less conversation generally because of that.

Dustin asked this question in December of 2006.  In the two plus years since then we have gotten a lot of comments by not having restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,</p>
<p>Many people prefer to be anonymous for good reason.  </p>
<p>1) They are sometimes commenting from work and the date and time stamps will show that they were here vs. working <img src='http://raincityguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>2) One of our commenters stayed anonymous while he was home shopping, because he didn&#8217;t want the agents to see what he was thinking while he was looking at houses.  It could give them an advantage when he made an offer.  As soon as he bought a house, he removed the anonymous moniker.</p>
<p>Many professionals want the commenters to not be anonymous, but what they want is more important because without readers&#8230;we are nothing but people talking to each other.  </p>
<p>Look at the Seattle Real Estate Professionals Blog and most often it is just the writers talking to one another&#8230;because they require registration.  They do not require that people use real names, but they do require registration, and they have less conversation generally because of that.</p>
<p>Dustin asked this question in December of 2006.  In the two plus years since then we have gotten a lot of comments by not having restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Gropp</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Gropp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-337513</guid>
		<description>As for me, &lt;strong&gt;I vote for 4. Require people to register&lt;/strong&gt; with Rain City Guide before leaving a comment. This would include an automatic email address verification. We contributors have our faces and/or reputations attached to everything we write. JG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me, <strong>I vote for 4. Require people to register</strong> with Rain City Guide before leaving a comment. This would include an automatic email address verification. We contributors have our faces and/or reputations attached to everything we write. JG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric sneo</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-329840</link>
		<dc:creator>eric sneo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-329840</guid>
		<description>anonymous comments almost always leads to spam

then you start seeing crazy random things like &quot;macielter stop googling the term &quot;macielter&quot;  when you type macielter it lets me know that you are searching macielter. I am trying to fill the SERPs with macielter. So yeah macielter&quot;

which doesn&#039;t  sense and makes me think it is computer generated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anonymous comments almost always leads to spam</p>
<p>then you start seeing crazy random things like &#8220;macielter stop googling the term &#8220;macielter&#8221;  when you type macielter it lets me know that you are searching macielter. I am trying to fill the SERPs with macielter. So yeah macielter&#8221;</p>
<p>which doesn&#8217;t  sense and makes me think it is computer generated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3 cents</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>3 cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>I do not think there is any doubt that the degree of honesty and number of comments rise with the level of anonymity.   Unfortunately, so does spam, personal insult, and the like, which keep filters, human and machine, busy and awake at night.    The key is to find that balance.

As a pragmatist, I would say experiment and see what works (happens).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think there is any doubt that the degree of honesty and number of comments rise with the level of anonymity.   Unfortunately, so does spam, personal insult, and the like, which keep filters, human and machine, busy and awake at night.    The key is to find that balance.</p>
<p>As a pragmatist, I would say experiment and see what works (happens).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>Dustin -

Two thoughts - require a valid email address (for forgotten password retrieval, if nothing else) and maybe some rules (I have some very basic ones here - http://www.realcentralva.com/the-rules/) and this one may be appropriate:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
3. If you choose to write under a nom de plume, please be consistent in that use so that others can track your opinions. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that anonymity gives some the freedom to comment where they may not otherwise. Requesting that they do so with the same &quot;handle&quot; doesn&#039;t seem too much to ask.

My two cents.

--Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin -</p>
<p>Two thoughts &#8211; require a valid email address (for forgotten password retrieval, if nothing else) and maybe some rules (I have some very basic ones here &#8211; <a href="http://www.realcentralva.com/the-rules/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.realcentralva.com/the-rules/)</a> and this one may be appropriate:</p>
<blockquote><p>
3. If you choose to write under a nom de plume, please be consistent in that use so that others can track your opinions. </p></blockquote>
<p>I think that anonymity gives some the freedom to comment where they may not otherwise. Requesting that they do so with the same &#8220;handle&#8221; doesn&#8217;t seem too much to ask.</p>
<p>My two cents.</p>
<p>&#8211;Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments.  The three of you represent an excellent slice of the people whose comments I would &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; want to loose with a registration system!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.  The three of you represent an excellent slice of the people whose comments I would <strong>not</strong> want to loose with a registration system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Yormark</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Yormark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>Seems like it&#039;s been pretty clean up to this point.  I&#039;d say let it be until it becomes a problem.  Then at that point, require people to register with a valid email address.  Those that contribute regularly and have something valuable to say, won&#039;t mind the 2 minute hassle of registering once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it&#8217;s been pretty clean up to this point.  I&#8217;d say let it be until it becomes a problem.  Then at that point, require people to register with a valid email address.  Those that contribute regularly and have something valuable to say, won&#8217;t mind the 2 minute hassle of registering once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Morford</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Morford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2006/02/24/should-rcg-allow-anonymous-comments/#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>Dustin, I agree that keeping RCG a dynamic community is important as I am among those who have enjoyed reading all the posts and comments. In my experience however in 2001 when I had a real estate blog (it was the infant stage of the site I now have) with the ability to post anoymous comments that because of the high readership it was a target for people who didn&#039;t really want to add to the community but rather spirl it into chaos and add their links to un-related sites. I eventually ended up only allowing registered users to post and after a few years I took out the commenting ability all together because I didn&#039;t have the time to play gate keeper as sad as that is.  We would like to think that everyone that is reading RCG is beneifiting from the great community that you&#039;ve created and want to contribute in a postive way but there are always those out there who want to ruin something good. You might consider only allowing registered users or putting some restrictions on the posts (valid emails) to encourage the good and continuous dialogue that you&#039;ve been experiencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin, I agree that keeping RCG a dynamic community is important as I am among those who have enjoyed reading all the posts and comments. In my experience however in 2001 when I had a real estate blog (it was the infant stage of the site I now have) with the ability to post anoymous comments that because of the high readership it was a target for people who didn&#8217;t really want to add to the community but rather spirl it into chaos and add their links to un-related sites. I eventually ended up only allowing registered users to post and after a few years I took out the commenting ability all together because I didn&#8217;t have the time to play gate keeper as sad as that is.  We would like to think that everyone that is reading RCG is beneifiting from the great community that you&#8217;ve created and want to contribute in a postive way but there are always those out there who want to ruin something good. You might consider only allowing registered users or putting some restrictions on the posts (valid emails) to encourage the good and continuous dialogue that you&#8217;ve been experiencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
