<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The (legal) importance of a home inspection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raincityguide.com/2007/04/26/the-legal-importance-of-a-home-iinspection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raincityguide.com/2007/04/26/the-legal-importance-of-a-home-iinspection/</link>
	<description>Seattle&#039;s Leading Resource for Real Estate Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:01:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2007/04/26/the-legal-importance-of-a-home-iinspection/#comment-211487</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2007/04/26/the-legal-importance-of-a-home-iinspection/#comment-211487</guid>
		<description>This is not legal advice.  If you want legal advice, you need to retain an attorney.  

A &quot;leg to stand on&quot; is a pretty flexible concept, particularly in small claims court where there are very relaxed rules of evidence.  Every trial -- even small claims -- carries the risk of an adverse verdict and a finding of liability.  Based on the facts that you&#039;ve described, it sounds like you have a defense to the claim.  However, you never know how a court will decide.  Plus, the buyer may have additional evidence of which you are not aware right now.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not legal advice.  If you want legal advice, you need to retain an attorney.  </p>
<p>A &#8220;leg to stand on&#8221; is a pretty flexible concept, particularly in small claims court where there are very relaxed rules of evidence.  Every trial &#8212; even small claims &#8212; carries the risk of an adverse verdict and a finding of liability.  Based on the facts that you&#8217;ve described, it sounds like you have a defense to the claim.  However, you never know how a court will decide.  Plus, the buyer may have additional evidence of which you are not aware right now.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWM</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2007/04/26/the-legal-importance-of-a-home-iinspection/#comment-211356</link>
		<dc:creator>CWM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/2007/04/26/the-legal-importance-of-a-home-iinspection/#comment-211356</guid>
		<description>I have a situation where the Buyer refused to retain specialized inspectors for the roof and mold.  He is now coming back the me (the Seller) in small claims court claiming I knew about mold and a problem with the roof.  I disclosed that the roof had been repaired 5 years prior and we knew nothing of mold.  His general home inspector passed on the roof.  No mold was obvious  Does the buyer have a leg to stand on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a situation where the Buyer refused to retain specialized inspectors for the roof and mold.  He is now coming back the me (the Seller) in small claims court claiming I knew about mold and a problem with the roof.  I disclosed that the roof had been repaired 5 years prior and we knew nothing of mold.  His general home inspector passed on the roof.  No mold was obvious  Does the buyer have a leg to stand on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
