<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mortgage Rates Dip to Low 5&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/</link>
	<description>Seattle&#039;s Leading Resource for Real Estate Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:58:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kary L. Krismer</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329796</link>
		<dc:creator>Kary L. Krismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329796</guid>
		<description>To follow up on #34 above, I did my piece on rent vs. buy, which assumes a cash purchase of owner occupied homes.

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/realestate/archives/156248.asp

The numbers come out with a return of 3.4-3.5%, which assuming a 25% marginal tax rate would put the return at about 5%--tax free.

This is a much more realistic assumption than buying with a $50,000 gift, although neither is obviously something anyone can do.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on #34 above, I did my piece on rent vs. buy, which assumes a cash purchase of owner occupied homes.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/realestate/archives/156248.asp" rel="nofollow">http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/realestate/archives/156248.asp</a></p>
<p>The numbers come out with a return of 3.4-3.5%, which assuming a 25% marginal tax rate would put the return at about 5%&#8211;tax free.</p>
<p>This is a much more realistic assumption than buying with a $50,000 gift, although neither is obviously something anyone can do.  <img src='http://raincityguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329794</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329794</guid>
		<description>Ardell -

Someone with $50k cash and buying a $230k townhouse is so atypical that you may be right, if they got that money from the sky and didn&#039;t care about possibly losing it then they may be better off buying right now. BTW, that $50k in a 5% FDIC savings account would basically even out the equation again, they&#039;d make about $200/mo in interest. Either way, if I had $50k in cash sitting around I probably wouldnt plow it into a cheap townhouse right now unless I had yet another bundle of cash sitting around for emergencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ardell -</p>
<p>Someone with $50k cash and buying a $230k townhouse is so atypical that you may be right, if they got that money from the sky and didn&#8217;t care about possibly losing it then they may be better off buying right now. BTW, that $50k in a 5% FDIC savings account would basically even out the equation again, they&#8217;d make about $200/mo in interest. Either way, if I had $50k in cash sitting around I probably wouldnt plow it into a cheap townhouse right now unless I had yet another bundle of cash sitting around for emergencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kary L. Krismer</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329792</link>
		<dc:creator>Kary L. Krismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329792</guid>
		<description>Ardell, re 37, $50,000 would certainly skew the numbers, but I was going to use an example where the owner uses their own funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ardell, re 37, $50,000 would certainly skew the numbers, but I was going to use an example where the owner uses their own funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kary L. Krismer</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329791</link>
		<dc:creator>Kary L. Krismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329791</guid>
		<description>Bili, on average prices are 20% off the peak.  With the right seller you can easily get below market pricing.  That could easily be the additional 10%.  But you can do even better than that.  The example I emailed to Ardell was 30% off the 2006 prices of a townhouse just a couple of units over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bili, on average prices are 20% off the peak.  With the right seller you can easily get below market pricing.  That could easily be the additional 10%.  But you can do even better than that.  The example I emailed to Ardell was 30% off the 2006 prices of a townhouse just a couple of units over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda Porter</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329789</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329789</guid>
		<description>Not to interupt this thread...I&#039;m just popping in to say I have updated rates for this morning at  http://budurl.com/ratesDec4am and I&#039;ll be posting rates this afternoon--around lunch time--here at Rain City Guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to interupt this thread&#8230;I&#8217;m just popping in to say I have updated rates for this morning at  <a href="http://budurl.com/ratesDec4am" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/ratesDec4am</a> and I&#8217;ll be posting rates this afternoon&#8211;around lunch time&#8211;here at Rain City Guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cautious buyer</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329788</link>
		<dc:creator>cautious buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329788</guid>
		<description>Can you specify a neighborhood?

A $50,000 one time gift offer would skew the equation much more toward the buy side.  I wish I had one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you specify a neighborhood?</p>
<p>A $50,000 one time gift offer would skew the equation much more toward the buy side.  I wish I had one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARDELL</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329787</link>
		<dc:creator>ARDELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329787</guid>
		<description>Kary,

In my example the client has a one time gift offer of $50,000 at time of purchase.  It&#039;s a use it or lose it proposition.  So using it works best in that case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kary,</p>
<p>In my example the client has a one time gift offer of $50,000 at time of purchase.  It&#8217;s a use it or lose it proposition.  So using it works best in that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARDELL</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329786</link>
		<dc:creator>ARDELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329786</guid>
		<description>Because even at those prices, there aren&#039;t enough selling to reflect in the stats.  The best the market has to offer, as in the one you buy, will never be &quot;the norm&quot; reflected in &quot;the stats&quot;.

Sampai&#039;s purchase was 30% under peak pricing.  It&#039;s not hypothetical.  By the time the stats would say 30% under peak as a median, you wouldn&#039;t want 30% under peak.

Stats are medians...median price is never best possible scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because even at those prices, there aren&#8217;t enough selling to reflect in the stats.  The best the market has to offer, as in the one you buy, will never be &#8220;the norm&#8221; reflected in &#8220;the stats&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sampai&#8217;s purchase was 30% under peak pricing.  It&#8217;s not hypothetical.  By the time the stats would say 30% under peak as a median, you wouldn&#8217;t want 30% under peak.</p>
<p>Stats are medians&#8230;median price is never best possible scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biliruben</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329785</link>
		<dc:creator>biliruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329785</guid>
		<description>Townhomes are down nearly 30% from peak?!?  Why isn&#039;t this reflected in any of the official stats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Townhomes are down nearly 30% from peak?!?  Why isn&#8217;t this reflected in any of the official stats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kary L. Krismer</title>
		<link>http://raincityguide.com/2008/11/25/mortgage-rates-dip-to-low-5s/#comment-329784</link>
		<dc:creator>Kary L. Krismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raincityguide.com/?p=3541#comment-329784</guid>
		<description>I think the rent vs. buy argument is pretty compelling on the buy side for those with cash.  Leverage is actually bad for that calculation.  I was planning on doing a piece on that over in P-I Land shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rent vs. buy argument is pretty compelling on the buy side for those with cash.  Leverage is actually bad for that calculation.  I was planning on doing a piece on that over in P-I Land shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
