Author Archives: Rhonda Porter

About Rhonda Porter

Rhonda Porter is an NMLS Licensed Mortgage Originator MLO121324 for homes located in Washington state. Her blog, The Mortgage Porter, is nationally recognized for sharing relevant information to consumers about mortgages. She has been originating mortgages since 2000 at Mortgage Master Service Corporation #40445 Consumer NMLS Website: http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org/TuringTestPage.aspx?ReturnUrl=/EntityDetails.aspx/COMPANY/40445 NMLS ID 40445. Equal Housing Opportunity. You can follow Rhonda on @mortgageporter, Facebook and/or Google+

30 Year Fixed Under 5%

Posted on by

Conforming mortgage rates for the 30 year fixed are at a 4 year low.  I’m providing live rate quotes on Twitter which you can see without leaving Rain City Guide–just click on the Mortgage Info tab to view.   This will bring on a “refi boom” which means that if you are interested in a mortgage, you should be prepared for the process to take longer and provide your mortgage professional as much information as possible.  There are fewer loan originators in today’s market (which, overall, is a good thing). 

Last words of “wisdom” or advice for those considering taking advantage of these rates is to work with a loan originator who has the ability to renegotiate your rate after locking should rates improve.  You must ask your LO this upfront (before engaging into a transaction) since not all lenders can do this.

I’ll do a follow up post when I have more time…I’m a little busy right now quoting rates and locking loans.  😉

Fidelity Title Calls Off the LandAmerica Merger

Posted on by
191

Update: Since I wrote this post, Fidelity is back on with the LandAmerica merger (11/26/2008).

LandAmerica has released a statement to the public regarding this recent debacle which has many wondering what will happen to this large title insurance underwriter.   As I write this post, their stock is sitting at $0.54 a share.  LandAm’s 52 week high is $53. 

From Inman News:

The deal was announced on a Friday. The following Monday, LandAmerica detailed record third-quarter losses and said the company was in violation of financial debt covenants of its note-purchase agreement and credit agreement (see story).

LandAmerica said it was in discussion with creditors to obtain waivers. If not waived, the covenant violations “constitute an event of default under the agreements, giving the lenders the right to declare all principal and accrued interest payable immediately,” LandAmerica said at the time.

LandAmerica’s public statement, which is in a question and answer format clearly states that their ability to pay claims is adequately covered by the reserves.   Locally, LandAmerica has joint ventures with Commonwealth of the Puget Sound  (Windermere), Rainier Title (John L. Scott and Coldwell Bank Bain) and Northpoint Title.   From the statement:

“What about other LandAmerica entities?

LandAmerica is comprised of many separate legal subsidiaries with separate profit and loss statements.  Some entities are performing well and others are not performing well.  We are working closely with the Nebraska Department of Insurance, which is where major underwriters are domiciled, to resolve our situation in a way that benefits our policyholders.”

This leaves a bigger question of what percentage of ownership does LandAmerica have in these joint ventures and what will happen to these ownership shares?

“What is the financial viabililty of LandAmerican underwriters?

The LandAmerica underwriters, Lawyers Title and Commonwealth have over $300 million in combined statutory surplus.  And we have some of the industry’s most stringent requirements for reserves in place to protect our policyholders.  The LandAmerica underwriters’ claims reserves are backed by over $1.1 billion in cash and investments.”

Reserves are mandetory…what about operating expenses?

Two Flaws with the new Good Faith Estimate

Posted on by
22

Let me begin by saying I think that uniform Good Faith Estimates are a huge step in the right direction. However, I’m quickly reviewing the newly revised Good Faith Estimate and HUD-1 Settlement Statement (beginning on page 46; link below) to see if any changes were made since they were unveiled. The two biggest issues that I see are:

  1. No clearly marked monthly mortgage payment.
  2. No funds due for closing.

HUD boasts that consumers will save an average of $700 by using these new forms, yet consumers won’t have the tools to compare without these two factors. It seems like HUD was so focused on YSP (which seems less clear to me on the new form) and controlling closing costs, they skipped a few important details.

Am I missing something right under my nose? Click here to read the final rule. I’ll go through this again and perhaps dig into the entire document over the weekend…I’m just wondering if any of you have more insight into this.

Interview with Jillayne Schlicke – Part 2: The SAFE Act

Posted on by
14

Earlier this month I shared an interview with Jillayne Schlicke.  Part One addressed LO’s getting ready for 2009.  The second half of my interview touches on The S.A.F.E. ACT which is a part of HR 3221.  The Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 is a part of the massive HR 3221.  If you are planning on originating residential mortgage loans in 2009, which is just over a month away, I hope you’ve all ready checked out the NMLS (Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System) site to get your ducks in a row…be sure to have a large bottle of aspirin (or something stronger) handy.  The NMLS states that to assure your information is processed by January 1, 2009, you need to submit the required information to by December 1, 2008.   I just checked the process of my NMLS license and because I filed at 9pm on October 1, 2008, my registration is currently showing as “transition requested” and I’m directed to contact DFI.  DFI is telling me that I registered on October 2, 2008, and they’re working on applicants who applied by October 1, 2008.  I do hope my fellow Washington State Loan Originators were at least a day earlier than I with registering at NMLS to be in compliance with The SAFE Act.   Enough of my griping…my questions to Jillayne are bold and italic.

Which loan originators are impacted by the SAFE Act?

All LOs will be impacted by the SAFE Act, some more than others.  Looking up the chain of command, mortgage brokers and consumer loan lender manager/owners will also be impacted because this adds a layer of administration at the federal level that was previously not in place.  Today, brokers and owners can call their state licensing regulators and receive an answer to their licensing questions in a reasonable amount of time.  Networking with the federal regulators back in Washington DC may or may not offer broker/owners the same level of prompt service and hours of operation for those on the west coast.

Non-depository lenders and brokers must take a 20 hour prelicensing class and 8 hours of continuing education every year.  Some states already have these provisions in place and other states go above and beyond this level.  STates that have pre and post education requirements that are less than what’s required under the SAFE Act must raise their standards to the federal level.

The banks asked for and received exemption from the prelicensing and continuing education requirements mandated by the SAFE Act.  It’s quite possible that FDIC insured banks pointed out they already have ongoing training in place for their employees.

All LOs, no matter where they work, must become registered.

Even with the additional costs and time, this is a step in the right direction for our industry.  It’s time to support the framework that will lead to the eventual repair of consumer confidence in our lending system that must begin at some point.  This is a good place to start.

How will the SAFE Act impact your business?

I’ve been thinking about this for several months.  The 20 hour prelicensing mandate will have very little effect on educators at this time.  There are very few people interested in becoming loan originators right now because the income potential for a new licensee who knows relatively little about the complexities of the industry have dropped dramatically in 2008.

The 8 hours of required continuing education is only 2 more hours per year than Washington State’s 6 hour requirement.

Instead of higher revenues, the changes that will impact continuing education will be that of curriculum development and approval.  It appears right now that the states are going to defer to NMLS to approve our courses and to approve course providers, although this has not been confirmed.  Dealing at the state level is always preferred to dealing at the federal level because the states tend to be more responsive.  We can go to regular scheduled meetings and talk directly to our regulators, we can schedule meetings with them and drive to Olympia if needed, to voice concerns and receive direct answers.

I already see a difference.  When asking questons of the NMLS folks they pawn me off to the states.  The state says to call NMLS.  The whole system is suppose to be ready to go in 2009 yet at no point has the NMLS  communicated to us (course providers) what the guidelines will be for approving providers and courses.

The other problem educators face is the mandate on curriculum.  But that’s another topic for another interview.  🙂

2009 FHA Loan Limits for Seattle-Bellevue and Beyond

Posted on by
14

King, Snohomish and Pierce Counties loan limits effective January 1, 2009 are:

  • Single Family: $506,000
  • Two Family:  $647,750
  • Three Family:  $783,000
  • Four Family:  $973,100

The new loan limit is lower than the current FHA Jumbo limit of $567,500 and is happens to be the same as the jumbo-conforming (aka high-balance) loan limits for our area for 2009.

Credit Scores for the Ages

Posted on by
5

It’s funny how sometimes a post will take on a life of it’s own within the comments…such is the case with my recent interview of Jillayne Schlicke.  My intentions were to call out to Washington State LOs to make sure they’re up to speed with the new year approaching…the comments have turned into a discussion of credit scores.  Most likely because of Jillayne’s prediction:

“I expect that underwriting guidelines will continue to go up as banks and conforming paper sold to Fannie and Freddie will raise minimum credit score requirements to 800 and require 20% down.  Everyone else will be pushed to FHA.”

Ardell offered stats from 2005 on credit scores and age so I thought I’d share credit score information from credit reports I’ve provided since the start of 2008.  Not all of the subjects obtained a mortgage loan.

  • Age 18 – 29: average credit score = 697.   Don’t let age fool ya, this group had a high score of 807 and a low of 513.  (This group = 12% of the demographic).
  • Age 30 – 39: average credit score = 735.  High score of 811 and the low at 614. (36% of demographic).
  • Age 40 – 49: average credit score = 739.  High score of 819 and a low of 592. (31% of demographic).
  • Age 50 – 59: average credit score = 759.  High score of 820 and the low at 680. (15% of the demographic).
  • Age 60 – 69: average credit score = 714.  High score of 813 and a low at 589.  (4% of the demographic).
  • Age 70 plus: average credit score = 805. High and low score: 805. (1% of the demographic).

The average mid scores, year to date credit reports I’ve ran is 732 for the borrower and 720 for the co-borrower.  This means that if they are considering locking, the rate would be based on the lower of the two mid scores.  I’m also pleased to see that the credit score criteria that I use (credit scores from 720-739) seems to be appropriate for when I’m post.

From the same interview with Jillayne post, Ardell asks:

“What good is it to say interest rates are at 5.875%, if only people 70 plus can get that rate? False advertising…no? If the average person buying a home can only get a rate of 6.5%, then we have to stop encouraging people to think their rate is going to be something that is unlikely”

Using the credit score data above, it’s very likely that the younger group would be FHA candidates.  Not just because of having an average credit score of 697, most are still working on building their savings and do not have 20% down payment.  Combine a 697 mid score with a 90% loan to value and (now costly) private mortgage insurance and FHA may be the better option.  The key is to investigate all available options if someone decides they should buy a home at this stage of their life.  

The next two groups, 30-49 year olds, would fit the rates that I quote at RCG since the credit score criteria I use is based on 720-739.  Based on Friday’s rates, their rate would be 5.875% at 1 point (total shown in lines 801, 802 and 808 of the Good Faith Estimate or HUD).   This combined group is 67% of the applications with credit reports that I have worked with year to date.

Credit scores 740 and above qualify for a slightly better rate.  Based on Friday’s scenario, they would have 0.25% improvement to fee–so 5.875% would be at 0.75% points (using the above example).  Or depending on how rates were, they could possibly obtain an 0.125% better rate.

The slight dip in average credit score to 714 for ages 60-69 I think just reflects that “life happens”.  Maybe something medical has taken place or you were on vacation and thought you paid that credit card or you’re helping your kids with college or you have an unknown parking ticket or an overdue library book turned into a collection.   I’ve seen many surprised people over the years where they had no idea their credit score dropped.   This is in no way a reflection on this age group, it’s just how the stats came in for this report based on my data.

FHA credit scores (where the credit report was ran and FHA was the identified loan program, the loan may be closed or just prequalified) averaged 680.  FHA is not as credit score sensitive as Fannie/Freddie.  FHA is looking for clean credit (no lates) in the past 12 months.

This data is hardly scientific and is really just a reflection of the people I work with which is really pretty diverse.  I don’t advertise or do cold calling or try to “specialize” in a niche market…so I’d like to think that this group is a good “norm”.

2009 Conforming and Conforming Jumbo Loan Limits for Seattle Metro

Posted on by
3

Update April 9, 2009:  On February 23, 2009 FHFA announced that according to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009 loan limits will be revised to the 2008 loan limits.  As of this update, we’re anticipating the higher revised limits to take place at any time (1-Unit for this area will return to $567,500).  FHA has all ready implemented the loan limit changes.   This serves as a reminder that any information on the internet regarding mortgages can be out dated in a fairly short amount of time.

This morning, the Federal Housing Finance Agency has announced the 2009 conforming and jumbo conforming loan limits for 2009.  The conforming loan limit will remain at $417,000.  The jumbo conforming was reduced to 115% of median home value from 125%, with the passage of HR 3221.   Based on the new lower estimated home values, the 2009 conforming jumbo limits for King, Snohomish and Pierce Counties are:

  • 1-Unit:  $506,000
  • 2-Unit:  $647,500
  • 3-Unit:  $783,000
  • 4-Unit:  $973,100

Some banks and lenders have all ready began to send notices that they will stop accepting locks for the 2008 conforming jumbo limits ($567,500 for 1-unit) effective later this month.    This is done so that once the loan is sold and closed to Fannie or Freddie, the loan limit is compliant.   (You may not have until the end of the year to take advantage of the $567,500 loan limit).

More to follow…including updated rates this afternoon.

Interview with Jillayne Schlicke – Part 1: LO's Are You Ready for 2009?

Posted on by
32

I recently contacted Jillayne to see if she would be open to an “interview” geared to Loan Originators who plan to sticking around beyond the end of this year…of course, she agreed!  😉   Jillayne offers training and clock hour approved courses to LOs and I thought this would be good timing to touch base with her.  This will be a two part series with the next post addressing the SAFE Act (national licensing). My questions to Jillayne are in italic text.

What should Loan Originators be doing right now to prepare for 2009?

Jillayne:  Well, let’s first define LO’s.  In my mind, we’re talking about LO’s who work for non-depository lenders such as mortgage broker LOs and CLA [correspondent lenders, credit union and consumer loan] LOs.  Loan originators who need to work for an FHA lender have all ready made that move.  Those who have not, will.  LOs who work for a lender or broker that is not FHA approved are all ready finding other sources of money.  Some LOs have already positioned themselves nicely but are experiencing a dramatic drop in income.

Many LOs made six figures income during 2006 and 2007 and subsequently have a six figure lifestyle that they are already trying to pare down to match 2008 income levels.  Income levels will remain volatile in 2009.  Existing client bases will not return the same income level as prior years.  LOs must prepare for the recession and start to research what kinds of industries survive and thrive in a down market and begin to reach out to people in those industries today.

Loan modifications have popped up out of nowhere to become the current “get rich quick” scheme marketed to hungry LOs.  Stories are circulating about LOs wo are closing 60 loan mods a month.  This is a possible untapped revenue source for LOs, however, there are some big liability pitfalls to navigate in the form of state laws, federal laws and contract laws.  Loan mod salesmen have been pitching lots of different programs, charging LOs thousands to buy into a “system”, without knowledge of state and federal laws.   LOs must be cautious and do their homework before jumping in head first.  Massive government intervention in foreclosures may make that “system” investment worthless.  There are ways to do loan modifications without putting your license in danger.

What trends are you seeing in the mortgage industry?

Jillayne:  Mortgage lenders, no matter where they work; banker, broker, consumer lender, credit union, ought to be prepared for more regulations at the state and federal level.  The winds of change are blowing in favor of the consumers.  The industry went through this in the 1970s when we saw a wave of consumer protection legislation such as the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act (RESPA), Truth-in-Lending, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

We have only seen the beginning of what will likely be more consumer protection.   The consumer must be told in a clear way what fees will be charged and how much the loan originator is making on the deal.  The mortgage broker industry mis-used Yield Spread Premium.  Because of this, the government will now tell mortgage brokers exactly how to explain that fee, and the brokerage industry won’t like it.  Watch for RESPA reform to pass and a new Good Faith Estimate.

I expect that underwriting guidelines will continue to go up as banks and conforming paper sold to Fannie and Freddie will raise minimum credit score requirements to 800 and require 20% down.  Everyone else will be pushed to FHA.

On the broker side, we’ll likely see more of the smaller, non-FHA approved brokers joining larger, branch office brokers with FHA-approval already in place.  Brokers who do not want to join the FHA party could take a look at the hard/private money side of the industry, which will likely grow as more people who always will be subprime return to their broker.  Brokers always have been a source of non-traditional money.  Now more than ever, subprime borrowers need that broker.  FHA is not the world’s subprime lender.  It was never intended for that purpose.

If we continue to push subprime towards FHA, then we will soon be looking at an FHA bailout.  Let’s not act surprised when it happens.

We are likely to see government intervention in the foreclosure crisis on a massive scale. FHA Secure and Hope 4 Homeowners will be deemed colossal failures because the underlying lenders simply cannot write down the principal balance on those non-performing loans without sending their own banks teetering into receivership.  I believe we are inching closer each day toward eventual nationalization of banks.

What are your most popular classes that you’re teaching right now?

Jillayne:  The short sale class, which I’ve taught for over ten years now, is very hot.  Other best sellers:  Foreclosure; Losing the American Dream, Current Issues in Lending, FHA Loans, Fiduciary Duties for Mortgage Brokers, and for Real Estate Agents: How to Survive in a Down Market and How to Become an REO Agent.  I’m starting to teach the fundamentals of a loan modification inside the Short Sales/Short Refis class and my class last week loved it so watch for one on loan mods.

On that note, I really recommend that Washington State LO’s make sure they’re signed up for their 2008 clock hour classes, if they have not all ready met their education requirements for licensing this year.  Be sure to check out Jillayne’s new Professional Education page here at RCG and watch for Part 2 of my interview with Jillayne where we discuss national licensing: The SAFE Act.

It's not how I voted, but….

Posted on by
28

I’m very hopeful that Obama will live up to the expectations.  This was actually my first time voting for a Republican candidate.  This was also the first election that I was proud and felt strongly about voting for a President.  

What President Obama had done is amazing and historic.  I’m not going to go into details about what I think was done right or wrong with the campaigns…it doesn’t matter anymore.

This could be what’s needed to pull America together and I do hope it all happens.

The FED drops the Funds Rate to 1.00%

Posted on by
16

The FOMC, during a scheduled meeting, elected to reduce the Fed Funds rate by 0.5% from 1.5% to 1.00%. Unless you have a HELOC that is floating (attached to the Prime Rate) this does not directly impact your mortgage interest rates. However, it will influence mortgage rates based on how traders react (50 basis points is what was expected). If you’re a long time reader of Rain City Guide, you’ve all ready heard this song and dance.

FOMC Press Release