FHA Annual Mortgage Insurance Increasing Next Week

FHA’s annual mortgage insurance premium is increasing effective on case numbers issued Monday, April 18, 2011 and later.  If you have an FHA transaction in process (or are considering an FHA refinance) you need to contact your mortgage professional ASAP to make sure they  have your FHA Case # no later than Friday.

On a sales price of $400,000 with the current minimum down payment of 3.5%, the monthly difference in payment between a case number by Friday and one on Monday is $80.42 per month!

And if your a mortgage originator, hopefully you don’t issue a Good Faith Estimate without your case number or your employer won’t be too happy with you.   Here’s a memo I just received from a wholesale lender:

Please note that increasing the annual (monthly) MIP is not considered a valid changed circumstance under RESPA to increase “Our Origination Charge” in Block 1 / HUD Line 801. Any unapproved changed circumstances will result in restitution to cure being charged to the originator.

This is a perfect example of why mortgage originators are sometimes hesitant to issue a Good Faith Estimate.  How do you cure a fee that is paid for a minimum of 60 months and 78% loan to value based on the original sales price?   And now that mortgage originators cannot pay to cure (correct) a Good Faith Estimate, their employers must…and this, my friends, is part of the reason why employers of mortgage originators (banks, mortgage companies, credit unions, etc.) are having to slightly pad the rates you have access to due to the Fed’s Loan Originator compensation rule.

Here’s HUD’s FAQ’s on RESPA regarding what happens if there are GSE, FHA or Mortgage Insurance program changes:

This could constitute a changed circumstance if the loan originator did not have notice of the GSE, FHA or other mortgage insurance program change prior to the issuance of the GFE. A loan originator may issue a revised GFE reflecting only the increased charges resulting from the ―changed circumstance‖.

There has been plenty of notice about this change…I’m just wondering how many LO’s (or their employers) might be caught by having to issue a Good Faith Estimate during this past week due to having all six pieces of information constituting an application, only to have the borrower “float” or not commit to proceeding…and then deciding to lock or commit Monday or later.

It’s not pretty.

GSE, FHA or Mortgage Insurance program changes.
A: This could constitute a changed circumstance if the loan originator did not have notice of the GSE, FHA or other mortgage insurance program change prior to the issuance of the GFE. A loan originator may issue a revised GFE reflecting only the increased charges resulting from the ―changed circumstance‖.

Don’t Let the Fed’s Rule on LO Compensation Lull You Into Believing Rates are the Same

Last week the Fed’s rule on mortgage originator compensation went effect divorcing a mortgage originators compensation from the interest rate and the borrower.   Regardless of how high or low an interest rate is, I am going to be paid the same.  This is a good thing.

What I’m finding is that many consumers and real estate professionals are assuming that this means all mortgage rates are the same.  This is not true.   Mortgage rates still vary from lender to lender.   The Fed does not control mortgage interest rates and I hope they (or any part of our government) never do.   Competition keeps mortgage rates low.  If we are ever left with just the big banks providing mortgages or controlling rates, consumers will pay dearly.

If you are to use shopping rates as one of the values for selecting your mortgage originator, please do not rely on APR…even Jillayne thinks it’s a mistake to shop by APR.   I do think there are other important factors besides rates (which are constantly changing) in selecting who will be helping you get your loan closed during this sometimes challenging climate…however when you do compare LO’s by rate, make sure to:

  • Contact each LO at the same time of the day (within 15 minutes) as it is not uncommon to have mortgage rates change 3-5 times PER DAY.
  • Give each LO the same criteria (credit score, sales price, loan amount, program, property type and estimated closing time/lock period)
  • Insist on quotes being provided in writing.  The LO does not have to issue a Good Faith Estimate without a complete application as defined by HUD, but they CAN provide you with a written rate quote.
  • Compare rates by total closing costs (all closing costs less any rebate pricing, if applicable).   Pre-paids and reserves do not need to be factored when shopping rates as this is property specific.

I’ve done some checking this morning to compare my rates to a credit union and a bank — I’m seeing a spread of about 0.5% in rebate for the same rate.   NOTE:  Consumers will need to become more accustomed to the terms:  REBATE (credit applied towards their closing cost) and DISCOUNT (additional cost to buy down the rate).   Consumers may be hard pressed to find a loan priced with exactly 1 or 0 points with the new rule.

Please do make sure that your mortgage originator is highly qualified to care for your financing needs.  Remember, 0.5% difference in fee or 0.125% in rate doesn’t mean a thing if your loan doesn’t close.

Real Estate Investing: It Can Be Lucrative, But So Are Ponzi Schemes

Another day spent closely reading the real estate section, another gem… Sunday’s local Times included this piece from the Philadelphia Enquirer that noted the large number of bank-owned properties on the market and the likely buyers of those properties: investors. Its a hot topic, and this article makes some good — although hardly disputed — points. But here’s my favorite passage:

Nationally, investors gobble up more than half of the bank-repossessed properties. “Most are rehabbing and renting them quickly to obtain a positive cash flow, then refinancing the property and taking the cash to buy another one,” Sharga said. They are looking at three- to five-year investments, he said, “so the current short-term depreciation of real-estate values isn’t a big deal.”

Other investors are doing wholesale flipping, Sharga said, buying “the most absolutely discounted properties, doing minor repairs and flipping to another investor, buying 20 cents on the dollar of the last sale price and selling for 50 cents.”

I added the emphasis, needless to say.

This raises the following question in my mind: Was Mr. Sharga laughing when he said this? Or maybe wearing a clown suit? I mean, what investor in his right mind says that you don’t have to worry about short term depreciation of the asset at issue if you intend to sell WAY off in the future — like 3 years! Even stock brokers will tell you that a 3-5 year investment horizon is relatively short and does not lend itself to risk. A depreciating asset at the time of purchase, to be sold 3-5 years down the road, should be a MAJOR concern to any investor. And that ignores the reality that transactional costs for real estate (taxes, commissions, escrow fees, insurance fees) are much higher than equities. Its a pretty absurd comment — but it will likely entice somebody to “invest” in real estate.

And why would that be important to Mr. Sharga? He spills the beans in the very next paragraph. At first blush, it sounds like these investments are fantastic: Pay 20% of “true value” — whatever that means, its another pet peeve of mine I’ll address in a future post — invest a few bucks, and then sell for 50% of value. That’s greater than 100% profit, presumably in 3 years or so! But here’s the catch: you gotta sell to “another investor.”

So this profit relies on pulling new investors into the market all the time, presumably those that don’t appreciate the fact that they’ve already missed the boat on the easiest profit. As long as those new investors are there to buy, the investors further up the pyramid… er, I mean supply chain will make great money.

Thinking of becoming a real estate investor? Yes, it can be lucrative, but be careful. And don’t believe everything you read.

Loan Originator Compensation… April Fools? NAMB says LO Comp delayed until April 4!

Wow…whether or not you are for or against the Fed’s rule on how mortgage originators can be compensated…you cannot deny that this has been a freaking roller coaster.   Here are updates from my earlier post:

UPDATE MARCH 28, 2011NAMB is reporting via Twitter they have been successful in obtaining a temporary restraining order hearing for tomorrow morning.

UPDATE MARCH 29, 2011Reading on Twitter that the Judge will rule before April 1, 2011 (by Thursday)…and that the Judge asked great questions and requested NAMB not file their temporary restraining order.

UPDATE 6:30 p.m. MARCH 29, 2011:  NAMB and NAIHP feel pretty hopeful that LO Comp may be delayed until July for Frank Dodd.   A note from NAMB that’s posted in Facebook is in my comments below.

UPDATE MARCH 30, 2011:  The Judge rules against the temporary restraining order.  View the Judge’s opinion by clicking here.

And now… http://twitter.com/#!/NAMBlive/status/53664096209477632:

Appellate Court grants a stay.  Hearing will be on 4/5.  RULE IS DELAYED UNTIL THE HEARING #locomp

Nothing on NAMB’s site tonight… they’ve updated Twitter first.  NAIHP has this on their Facebook page as well.

PS:  How do you feel about loan originator compensation?  If you have a mortgage, or are considering a mortgage to purchase a home or refinance, please answer 3 questions on this survey.

Loan Originators Who Argue That Predatory Lending was Bad Should Welcome the New FRB Rule on LO Compensation Prohibitions

funny pictures-Bad Idea: Agreeing to play a game of Monopoly with Basement Cat for your eternal soul.Under the final Federal Reserve Board’s loan originator (LO) compensation rule, effective April 1, 2011, an LO may not receive compensation based on the interest rate or loan terms. This will prevent LOs from increasing their own compensation by raising the consumers’ rate. LOs can continue to receive compensation based on a percentage of the loan amount and consumers can continue to select a loan where loan costs are paid for via a higher rate. The final rule prohibits an LO who receives compensation directly from the consumer from also receiving compensation from the lender or another party.

The final rule also prohibits LOs from steering a consumer to accept a mortgage loan that is not in the consumer’s interest in order to increase the LO’s compensation.

Though a lawsuit has been filed to stop the changes from going into effect, there has been legal research conducted by the FRB over the course of many years.

The FRB’s research found that consumers do not understand the various ways LOs can be compensated such as yield spread premiums (YSPs), overages, and so forth, so they cannot effectively negotiate their fees. Yes, some LOs spend many hours educating their borrowers but this is not true for all LOs.

YSPs and overages create a conflict of interest between the loan originator and consumer. For consumers to be able to make an educated choice, they would have to know the lowest rate the creditor would have accepted, and determine that the offered rate is higher than the lowest rate available. The consumer also would need to understand the dollar amount of the YSP to figure out what portion will be applied as a credit against their loan fees and what portion is being kept by the LO as additional compensation. Currently, mortgage broker LOs must do this, but LOs who work for non-depository lenders or depository banks are not required to disclose their overage.

LOs argue that consumers ought to read their loan docs and take personal responsibility for negotiating a good deal on their mortgage yet facts related to LO compensation are hidden from consumers when working with depository banks and non-depository lenders.

The FRB’s experience with consumer testing showed that mortgage disclosures are inadequate for the average random consumer to be able to understand the complex mechanisms of YSPs when working with mortgage broker LOs. Consumers in these tests did not understand YSPs and how they create an incentive for loan originators to increase their compensation.

For example, an LO may charge the consumer an LO fee but this may lead the consumer to believe that the LO will act in the best interest of the consumer. The FRB says: 

“This may lead reasonable consumers erroneously to believe that loan originators are working on their behalf, and are under a legal or ethical obligation to help them obtain the most favorable loan terms and conditions.”

Consumers may regard loan originators as ‘‘trusted advisors’’ or ‘‘hired experts,’’ and consequently rely on originator’s advice. Consumers who regard loan originators in this manner are far less likely to shop or negotiate to assure themselves that they are being offered competitive mortgage terms. Even for consumers who shop, the lack of transparency in originator compensation arrangements makes it unlikely that consumers will avoid yield spread premiums that unnecessarily increase the cost of their loan.

Consumers generally lack expertise in complex mortgage transactions because they engage in such mortgage transactions infrequently. Their reliance on loan originators is reasonable in light of originators’ greater experience and professional training in the area, the belief that originators are working on their behalf, and the apparent ineffectiveness of disclosures to dispel that belief.

The FRB believes that where loan originators have the capacity to control their own compensation based on the terms or conditions offered to consumers, the incentive to provide consumers with a higher interest rate or other less favorable terms exists. When this unfair practice occurs, it results in direct economic harm to consumers whether the loan originator is a mortgage broker or employed as a loan officer for a bank, credit union, or community bank.

The Feds Loan Originator Comp Plan is a Bad Aprils Joke on YOU, the Consumer

Effective April 1, 2011, residential mortgage originators will be required to follow the Fed’s new rules on how they can be compensated (unless the pending lawsuits or Congress is successful in delaying this).   You can follow #LOComp on Twitter to see the dialogue that has been taking place across the industry.   In many ways, the new plan will be good for mortgage originators.  Our new comp plan was revealed today and after it was announced that out of our office, I was one of the “cheapest” LOs, I discovered that I’m getting a slight raise.   Many LOs who like to charge less or to help absorb costs for their clients, will no longer be allowed to do this with the new rule.  LOs who were used to making more on loans may find themselves getting a paycut, if not now, then when Frank Dodd’s plans kick in this summer.

I thought to illustrate what is happening, it might be helpful to review an actual transaction I closed a few months ago.   It was a rate-term refinance, however, this scenario could happen with a purchase too.

These borrowers selected me to help them with their mortgage after I had been pricing rates for them for months waiting for rates to reach a certain point for their jumbo mortgage.   We locked in their rate at zero points (origination or discount) in mid-October.  During that time, we were in a refi boom and therefore refi’s were taking longer to close and it was a jumbo (which can also take longer to process) so I priced the rate with a 60 day lock.

The loan was locked with the lender who offered the best pricing at that moment based on their scenario for that time period.  Although we’re correspondent with this bank-lender, they do not allow us to underwrite non-conforming loans AND we have to use THEIR AMC.   There was a slight time delay (eats into the lock period) where the appraiser had difficulty connecting with the borrowers who had been traveling for a week and forgot to mention this to us.

The appraisal came back slightly lower than we had estimated however, the loan to value came in just slightly under 80% which made no impact to how their loan was priced.   We submitted the loan to the bank for full underwriting with the bank’s AMC appraisal.   The (out of state) bank underwriter determined that this home was too nice for the Seattle neighborhood and declined this “perfect transaction”.  

By now it’s November and we’re dealing with the holidays…which also impacts the lock period…which is getting close to expiring.    After much contemplating, the borrowers decide they would like to proceed with a second appraisal to support the value of the first appraisal…but first we have to wait for the bank to confirm they’ll consider…the lock continues to tick down towards expiration… the banks gives us the green light and we decide to try one more time with a 30 day extension to allow time for the 2nd bank appraisal and 2nd bank underwriting, 3 day right of rescission, the holidays… you name it.   The cost for the 30 day extension is 0.5% of the loan amount.   I decide that I’m going to split this amount with them.   This means that it’s costing me 0.25% of my commission to close this loan.   I also agreed to pay for half of the second appraisal if the bank approves the loan.   The transaction, for my very patient clients, did close.

Effective April 1, 2011 – I will not be allowed to pay for anything on behalf of my clients.  

As a mortgage originator, I will no longer be allowed to:

  • pay for extension fees, or
  • pay to cure items (for example, mistakes made on a good faith estimate that are beyond the allowed tolerances)’
  • help pay for a 442 re-inspection;
  • reduce my commission to help pay for closing cost.

This means that mortgage companies have to factor this new “cost of business” with how they will be pricing rates.   This is going to cost the consumer, mortgage companies and possibly real estate agents when it’s down to the wire and and the mortgage originator is forbidden by the Fed to chip in for the cost to extend a loan.   Many in the industry anticipate that rates will be slightly increased at the retail level in order for various types of mortgage companies, including banks, to deal with these costs which were commonly the responsibility of the mortgage originator.

NOTE:  I’m not a mortgage broker – I work for a correspondent lender so the rules we follow are far different than those of a broker.   I wish we all had the same rules to live by as “mortgage originators” regardless of the type of institution we work for…you’ll have to ask your elected officials back at Congress why this isn’t so.  

It’s going to be interesting to see how our system is revised for pricing loans.  I will automatically be paid a set amount which is based on the loan amount (allowed per the Fed).   Consumers that I work with will be able to see real time pricing and decide what rate at what price they want based on what is available at that moment they elect to lock.   My pay is out of the picture–and I do like that part HOWEVER, I do believe that if I want to chip in to help a borrower or reduce my commission because I know a transaction is a going to be a piece of cake, I feel I should have the freedom to do so.

My clients above would have to had either walked away from their transaction or have paid 0.5% of their jumbo loan amount to keep that rate…my hands would have been tied.

There’s so much more to this rule by the Fed but I just wanted to share one example of how I feel this rule is not going to do consumers any favors.

In my opinion, this smacks of HVCC and the 2010 Good Faith Estimate… great intentions from our government and clueless of the unintended consequences to the consumer…and our housing market.

UPDATE MARCH 28, 2011NAMB is reporting via Twitter they have been successful in obtaining a temporary restraining order hearing for tomorrow morning.

UPDATE MARCH 29, 2011Reading on Twitter that the Judge will rule before April 1, 2011 (by Thursday)…and that the Judge asked great questions and requested NAMB not file their temporary restraining order.

UPDATE 6:30 p.m. MARCH 29, 2011:  NAMB and NAIHP feel pretty hopeful that LO Comp may be delayed until July for Frank Dodd.   A note from NAMB that’s posted in Facebook is in my comments below.

UPDATE MARCH 30, 2011:  The Judge rules against the temporary restraining order.  View the Judge’s opinion by clicking here.

Redfin adds “feedback” comments to site features

Yesterday Redfin announced the launch of a new site feature that introduces the concept of “agent feedback” on a broader and more transparent scale.
AgentCommentRedfin

As with anything new, it will take a bit of time for things to “shake out” on this new feature, as we as an industry continue to balance the obligations to home sellers “IN” an mls system, and the wants and needs of home buyers who do not have any contractual rights within an mls system, the way that sellers do.

I will describe how this new feature appears to function at present, and as I understand it after having tested it.

When you search for property on Redfin and the little house icons appear on the map, some will have a yellow star to denote which properties have been “toured” by a Redfin agent AND the Redfin agent has noted their and/or their buyer client’s thoughts on the property.

If the house has no yellow star, it doesn’t mean it wasn’t EVER “toured” by a Redfin agent, only that the agent did not input a comment to the system after doing so.

RedfinAgentCommentsMap

If you click on the house icon with the yellow star, the address will appear in a link box. If you click on the link, you will get the property detail, but you will not yet SEE the comment made by the “field” agent. (“Field” agent is the term used by Redfin for agents who view property with prospective home buyers. (Agents “out in the field”.) Redfin “partner” agents also have access to posting comments, even though they are not employees of Redfin. Not sure if they can do that for all of the property they show, or only the property they show to a home buyer who was referred to them “by Redfin”. But I do know they have some access to this new feature as to leaving comments.

What you will see above the map of the parcel, and below the home detail specifics, is this: “Notes About (123 main street) from Redfin Agents Toured (X) Times” along with a Button you press that says “Email Notes to Me”.

Again, I don’t think it is accurate yet as to how many “Times” the home was toured by Redfin, but I’m confused on this issue. I have a listing toured by Redfin at least 2 times that does not have a yellow star, nor does it denote in the detail that it was ever toured by a Redfin “field” agent with a buyer (or Redfin “partner” agent). So I’m pretty sure ALL “tours” are not registering. I thought maybe “Toured 2 Times” meant there were 2 comments, but there is only 1 comment, so maybe that one agent toured it 2 times before making the comment.

Perhaps they should say “1 Comment” vs “Toured 2 Times” in the interest of “accuracy”, as “transparency” carries an obligation of a reasonable degree of accuracy as to factual content. As I said earlier, this is a minor point that will “shake out” vs “shake up” as time goes on.

When you click on the “Email Notes to Me” button, you will fairly instantaneously receive an email with the comment(s).

There is also a feature to receive new notes as they are added later on this property. That appears to be automatic, except if you click on the same property that sent you notes and hit that button again, it will give you an option to receive new notes. So not entirely sure on that one.

To receive these notes you DO NOT have to be a Redfin “CLIENT”. You simply have to be a “registered user” of the Redfin site, as I and most of my clients are.

********

BENEFITS? PROBLEMS?

1) The most notable problem is that at least two of the comments shown publicly in blog posts contain what we call “inappropriate language”. For example the one in this post from Glenn’s post says “ideal for a family” and one of the two comments posted on 1000Watt Consulting Blog by Brian Boero says “not for families with small children”.

The guideline for agents is we must talk ONLY about property and not make broad statements about who should live IN them. Both of those comments mention people vs home attributes, long considered taboo under HUD guidelines.

There are massive writings on this topic, but a good rule of thumb is:

TALK ABOUT THE HOUSE AND NOT THE PEOPLE:
1) WHO LIVE IN IT
2) WHO “SHOULD” BUY IT
3) WHO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

Talk about the home and it’s attributes, and not the people.

A long standing “rule” for real estate advertisements, or most any statements made by licensed agents, is talk about the house and not people.

HOWEVER I often will tell a specific client that a home is not right for them “and their small children” if the house has a master bedroom only on the 2nd floor, and the only other bedrooms are IN the basement, especially if we have already discussed that the master bedroom must on the same floor as their children’s bedrooms.

So I think if Redfin notes a specific “deficiency” of the property in that regard, without mentioning people, like “Master up; children’s bedrooms two floors below and in the basement”. That would be OK. But to simply say “not for families with small children”…well, that’s more about HOW you say it than what you say. Not a huge deal. Just another example of “shake out” of this new feature to come, IMO. What you can say TO a buyer client is different than what you can say “publicly”, and this new feature blurs the lines from a “Fair Housing Guidelines” standpoint.

2) That raises another issue. Let’s say Redfin Agents can say anything because they are speaking to Redfin site “registered users” only. Not saying that is the case, but let’s consider that as potentially the case.

Then the issue of Brian Boero, or any other “registered user”, POSTING those private email comments PUBLICLY becomes a problem.

Can he take a private email and display it publicly? I think Brian can, because I don’t think Brian is a licensed agent. I don’t think I can, unless I am linking to a public place (as I did) and it is not an email I personally received from the site.

If the rationale is ONLY “registered users” can see the comments, then shouldn’t there be an agreement with registered users that they will not publicly post those emailed comments? I think so.

3) The benefit generally is that Redfin continues to try to strike a good balance between the rights of buyers and sellers. But, the seller has a contract as to what their conditions are with regard to an mls being able to display their property information via the mls system. Buyers have no rights in that regard, as they have no written contract with “an mls system”.

I think most mls systems will allow the seller to block this feature, and will recommend that sellers do that, given the seller and the seller’s agent have very limited, if any, control or access to the function. That is generally against most any Listing Contract provision signed by a seller to gain access to the mls system. They are many and varied, but most require the Listing Agent and/or Listing Brokerage to have full control over information on “member” sites, which often limits the info to that available via an “mls” feed, with some and often many restrictions.

Time will tell, but that is my expectation. I think we will be seeing some NEW “mls rules” with regard to this new feature.

Real Estate – From Contract to Close of Escrow

What happens after the seller has accepted your offer? Often a buyer wants to relax and celebrate after their offer is accepted, especially if there were rounds of counter offers and acceptances. But some things need to happen pretty quickly after the contract is signed by all parties. This is a fairly good example of what actually happens most times. Not all contracts are the same. This is just a rough example of what usually happens in my transactions when I represent the buyer of a home, unless the contract requires us to do things differently than “the norm”.

1) SCHEDULE THE HOME INSPECTION

Usually the very first thing I have my buyer clients do once the contract is “signed around” by all parties, is schedule the home inspection. Often people read the contract to mean that they have 5 to 10 days (every contract is different) to DO the inspection. That is not the case.

During that very limited time frame:

a) You have to “DO” The Inspection
b) You have to review the results of The Inspection
c) You have to think about what you may or may not want to ask of the seller as a result of that Inspection
d) You have to cancel the contract, or accept the inspection, or submit any conditions of accepting the Inspection, in writing, so that it is RECEIVED by the seller or seller’s representative by the end of the time frame.

You don’t want to wait until the last minute to “DO” the inspection.

My recommendation is that you call the inspector ASAP after the contract is finalized and DO the inspection at the first available opportunity after the contract is signed around. By scheduling the inspection ASAP for the first available time, you should have sufficient time to digest what the inspector said at the inspection, and also to subsequently review the written inspection report after the inspector has left the property.

You should allow about 3 to 4 hours for the actual inspection in most cases for an average sized single family home.

2) OPEN ESCROW

By the time the contract is “signed around”, the Agent for the Buyer usually has the Earnest Money check in their possession (some exceptions). Opening Escrow can be as simple as bringing a copy of the contract and the Earnest Money check to escrow, and that is often done on the first business day after the contract is accepted. Sometimes I send the contract to escrow during the weekend, if the contract was accepted on a non-business day. This way escrow has everything they need to “open escrow” when they open for business on the first business day after the weekend. The check usually has to be delivered to escrow by the 2nd business day and this is another one of those ASAP situations. Get the check to escrow as soon as practically convenient vs waiting to the last minute. There is no official time frame as to when escrow must be OPENED, there is only a required time frame for when the EM check must be AT escrow. Most escrow holders will not accept a check for an escrow that has not been “opened”, so escrow is usually opened either in advance of that check needing to be delivered to escrow, or at the same time.

Generally this 2nd step is not done by the buyer or the seller, but by the agents in the transaction.

3) APPLY FOR YOUR MORTGAGE

This step is VERY IMPORTANT and often misunderstood.

Common “misconceptions”.

a) Some people think you don’t need to apply for your mortgage until after you complete the Home Inspection phase. Most contracts require that you apply for your mortgage in a shorter time frame than when the inspection needs to be completed.

b) Some people (usually agents) think that the buyer must apply to the same mortgage company who provided the pre-approval letter at time of offer. Usually a buyer has 5 business days or less to “apply” for their mortgage AFTER the contract is signed around and “chooses” which company to apply to during that time frame. It is near impossible in most cases to actually choose a lender prior to contract, because interest rates change during that time AND the interest rate often cannot be locked until there is a signed contract. So choosing lender by comparing rates and costs is usually best done at a point when that rate can be locked in.

b) Some people (usually buyers) think they already “applied for their mortgage” complying with the terms of their contract when they provided the information to a lender before making an offer so as to get a pre-approval letter.

c) Many people think that their rate is locked, or that their rate is locked indefinitely. Rate locks of 60 days are usually more expensive than rate locks for 30 days or 45 days.

In order to preserve your rights under the Finance Contingency you need to apply for your mortgage within the time frame stated in the addendum vs in the main contract.

To me the clear signal that you have “applied” for your mortgage happens when you give the lender a copy of a fully signed around contract to purchase a home, since that is the one thing you do AFTER the contract is fully signed around that you could not have done in advance.

You may have spoken with a few lenders and even gotten pre-approval letters from more than one, but in most cases you only send a copy of the contract to the lender you intend to use to complete the transaction.

Very important to note here that you may not have the ability to switch lenders once you have applied for your mortgage.

Interest rates change frequently, so calling a lender a day may only be telling you the difference in rates from day to day vs from lender to lender. I generally recommend that people set aside a day and time to compare lenders so they are all dealing with the same rate time frame, and be sure to compare all lender fees when comparing rates.

Should you lock the rate or “float” the rate? A combination of both where you can lock the rate but get at least one “float down” option as well, often works best. That way your rate can’t go up but it can go down.

Many other variables as to which type of loan, etc. But the main point here is no matter how long it is from contract to close, you usually have a very limited time frame to apply for your mortgage under the terms of the Finance Contingency, generally 5 days or less.

********
Note: Computation of Time: Sometimes The Home Inspection is Step 3 vs Step 4. That mostly depends on the availability of the inspector you choose. Sometimes you are having the home inspection within a day or two of the contract being signed around. In that case you often do the inspection before you apply for your mortgage.

Every contract is slightly different because of “Computation of Time”. In our standard contracts 5 days or less usually does NOT include weekends and holidays…but 6 days or more does.

So if you have 6 days to do the inspection and 5 days to apply for your mortgage, 5 days can be more than 6 days since the 6 = calendar days and the 5 = business days.
********

4) THE HOME INSPECTION

The inspection is paid for by the buyer, usually before the inspection begins. The buyer usually attends the Home Inspection because it is not a PASS/FAIL kind of thing in most cases. It is also not ONLY about what is wrong with the house. A good home inspection gives the buyer a lot of information that is not all about what the buyer may want the seller to do to correct defects.

Generally a Home Inspector will:

a) Inspect the outside of the home first. Roof, siding, gutters, etc. VERY IMPORTANT: Most inspectors are inspecting “the home” and not the fence or the shed and sometimes not even decks, especially if they are not connected to the house.

b) The inspector is usually not looking at cosmetic things that can be readily seen by the buyer prior to making the offer, such as a stain in the carpet.

c) An inspector cannot see through walls, so having an experienced inspector who likely knows what is behind those walls based on the age of the house is very important.

d) Since an inspector is not looking at cosmetic items, he will usually spend more time in bathrooms and kitchens, the attic and under the house, at the heater and electrical panel and hot water tank, than in a dining room or bedroom. In a bedroom he may check the outlets and the windows and make sure the door latches properly. In a kitchen or bathroom he will be checking appliances, looking for leaks under sinks, making sure the outlets in the rooms with water have appropriate and functioning GFCI (ground fault circuit interrupters) at the outlets. Often one GFCI will operate more than one outlet.

e) Generally you do not need to take notes at an inspection, as the inspector will be providing you with a written report. Hopefully the report will have a summary of major problems and a separate summary of minor problems. Today Inspection Reports can be 85 pages long with lots of tips on home maintenance and other topics. So a one page summary of actual defects is helpful.

IMPORTANT: If something is wrong with the property, you usually know it before you get the written report. If something comes up that causes you to not want the house at all, you may not want to complete the full inspection. In fact if you suspect that to be the case, you may ask the inspector to break from his normal routine and look at that item first.

HOUSES ALMOST NEVER “FAIL” ON INSPECTION. Contracts often fail “on inspection” due to other issues, BUT “HOUSES” RARELY “FAIL” ON INSPECTION.

Most often when a contract “fails on inspection” and “falls out of escrow” it is because of an erroneous or not reasonable expectation. The buyer isn’t doing what the seller expected the buyer to do, or the seller is not doing what the buyer expected the seller to do. Rarely does a real “deal-breaker” issue come up with the house, that the buyer and seller could not have known about in advance of the offer being made. Most often the contract fails because the buyer or the seller is not responding “appropriately” to an issue. That is usually an emotional problem, vs an actual “problem” with the house that can’t be rectified.

Good “Rule of Thumb” is no seller should expect the buyer to want absolutely nothing at inspection, and no buyer should expect a seller to address everything the inspector talks about as needing to be done to the house.

Instead of taking general notes during a home inspection, I find using a chart like this to be helpful during the inspection. The inspector says SO many things over a 3 to 4 hour period, so organizing them a bit while the inspector is there can help you raise questions at the end before the inspector leaves the premises.

Inspection Chart

Column One – OWNER SHOULD – There are no hard and fast rules here. Many items the Inspector notes as “needing to be done” are things any owner needs to do periodically. Is “The Owner” the Buyer of the Home? Or is “The Owner” the Seller of the home? While contracts often fail over these issues, they should not as they are things the buyer will need to do during their ownership of the home. These are not “once and done” items. If the gutters are so clogged and dirty because the owner never had them cleaned during their ownership, the buyer may ask the seller to have those professionally cleaned prior to closing. The buyer may put this in the “Seller SHOULD” column. Often this has to do with the number of trees dropping debris into the gutters.

Generally a buyer should not decide they do not want the house after all because the gutters are dirty and the seller won’t have them cleaned prior to closing, or because the seller won’t trim a small branch on a tree.

Just because the Inspector tells the buyer “the gutters need to be cleaned” does not mean the seller needs to DO something. The Inspector may simply be saying that at EVERY inspection so the buyer knows that this is a normal owner maintenance item. That statement alone does not mean there is something currently “wrong” with the gutters.

Column Two – OWNER MUST – These are usually things the seller would have fixed had he known they were not functioning properly. They are usually things that have no aesthetic selection element, so that it doesn’t matter if the buyer does them or the seller does them. They are usually things that can cause a problem or additional damage between inspection and closing.

As example, a leaking sink creates damage every day between the time you discover it and the time it is fixed, so having it fixed without delay is recommended. It is very rare that a seller would not want to fix that leak ASAP.

Column Three – SELLER SHOULD – Many items fall in here and are basically not major things. Often whether or not the seller “should” fix them has to do with the price of the home. If the buyer is paying a good and somewhat high “fair market value” then the buyer often expects these things to be done and the seller, happy with the price he got for the home, often does them. If the buyer is getting a screaming deal and the seller is walking away with nothing or less than nothing, the seller usually expects the buyer to accept the home with these issues not being addressed.

Often these are things the seller did not deem important enough to fix while he lived there, and not something the seller did not know about. A small crack in a window. A broken window seal (this is cosmetic in most cases). A bedroom door doesn’t “latch” properly, which is often fixed by tightening knob or hinge screws or adjusting the latch plate. Basically things that can be fixed with little or no cost and a screw driver.

Column Four – ?????This is where many sales can fall apart. These are usually large items that are “in working order” and not currently defective, but near or past their “life expectancy”. Roof is not leaking but 23 years old. Hot water tank is working just fine, but is 18 years old. Heater is working just fine, but is 30 years old. Again these items usually hinge on the price negotiated. If the Seller got the better end of the deal at initial price negotiation, the buyer’s expectations may be different than if the buyer is getting the home at a “below market” price. Often the seller and the buyer do not agree on THAT, on whether the price was at, above, or below market price and THAT is why the sale fails over one of these items. Not because of the item itself, but because the parties think one or the other is not being reasonable given the home price.

Does a house need a new roof because it is “old” but is not leaking? Does a hot water tank need to be replaced because of it’s age when it is functioning well?

Often these things are viewed differently in a Seller’s Market vs a Buyer’s Market.

5) PROPERTY APPRAISED

This item usually happens “in due course” meaning the buyer and seller do not order or control the time frame of this item. The Lender orders the appraisal and unless there is a problem with the appraisal, the contract simply proceeds toward closing. The Buyer usually pays for the appraisal in advance OR is responsible to pay for the appraisal even if they do not close escrow for some reason.

********

NOTE: MONEY the buyer needs to pay BEFORE closing. Earnest Money Deposit, Inspector Fees and Appraisal Fees. Depending on the size of the house, the inspector fees are usually $500 or so for one inspector/inspection and $450 or so for the appraisal. There could be more than one inspection needed, and if the home is unusually large or small the cost could vary. If you are only paying $199 for a Home Inspection, that is not a good sign. 🙂

6) HOMEOWNER’S/HAZARD INSURANCE

The buyer needs to purchase a full, one year, Hazard/Fire insurance policy AT closing. Once you are finished with the inspection and the lender has everything they need from you to process the loan, you should arrange for your Insurance Policy with your lender and escrow, who both need to coordinate with your insurance provider.

Most often the best rate is obtained by getting this insurance from the same company that does your car insurance, so be sure to get a quote from them.

Note: Title and Title Insurance Issues happen from before the property is listed through to closing. There are Title reviews and Title Insurance Policies and Supplemental updates of Title throughout the entire transaction. Sometimes these issues are critical, but most often they happen “in due course” and are not alarming. Both escrow and your lender are interacting with the Title Company throughout the transaction.

Title Insurance and Reports are usually pre-ordered by the seller before the home is listed for sale. The Buyer’s name is added when the buyer’s name is known. The Owner delivers “clear title” by paying for Owner’s Title and the buyer pays for Lender’s Title as a condition of their mortgage.

IN SUMMARY: MOST EVERYTHING THE BUYER NEEDS TO “DO” IS DONE IN THE FIRST 5 BUSINESS DAYS OR SO AFTER THE CONTRACT IS SIGNED. AT THE END OF THAT PERIOD THE BUYER EITHER CANCELS OR PROCEEDS TO CLOSING.

7) THE CLOSING Loan Documents arrive at escrow. Hopefully at least 3-5 days before the closing date noted in the contract. The buyer signs their closing papers which include the loan documents and the Final Estimated Numbers called the HUD 1 or Buyer’s Closing Statement and some other ancillary escrow forms. The Lender reviews the signed documents and “releases for recording”. Escrow Records the property in the new owner’s name with the County. Keys are available to the buyer after we have County Recording numbers OR on the date of possession noted in the contract.

Closing is a phone call saying “We have Recording Numbers”.

For the most part the buyer is VERY busy for the first 5 business days or so and then again near the end. In between everyone else is working hard. The seller is packing and moving out. Escrow is coordinating with the agents and the lender and the Title Company and the buyer’s insurance company and the County, and getting the seller’s payoffs so liens can be removed as to the seller’s mortgage and utility bills prior to closing.

THE BUYER SHOULD NOT BE PLANNING TO GO IN THE HOME THEY ARE BUYING AFTER THE HOME INSPECTION AND BEFORE CLOSING!

This often comes as a surprise to most home buyers. The seller is packing and usually does not want you IN the home while it is a mess of boxes! That is why you should do EVERYTHING during the inspection phase. Get estimates for new carpet or hardwoods, measure for curtains, measure for a refrigerator or washer and dryer if you plan on buying them before closing. If you don’t do it during inspection, you may have to wait until after closing.

No post like this is “all inclusive”. This one is written from the standpoint of a buyer purchasing a normal tract home on a normal lot with little problems and no HOA.

Here are a few others I wrote about 5 years ago. All good reading for a buyer or a seller after the initial inspection phase and before closing.

Anatomy of a Real Estate Transaction (Some good “extra” notes in the comments on that one.)

– Short Version for the Buyer

– Short Version for the Seller

– The Three Phases of a Real Estate Transaction form Contract to Close

Shades of Gray- Ethics of walking away

Are banks to blame for people signing the Note for the loan they sought?   Businesses (and Banks) are only as ethical as the leadership running the ship.  This is a very complicated issue with many moving parts.

Strategic Default Homeowner of 2004-2007:

“I hate the bank for forcing me to sign the Promissory Note for the loan (I mean the monthly payment) after I have considered my purchase for the 30-45 days it took to close and after my inspection contingency of said property.   I could probably keep making the payments that I knew I signed my loan paperwork for but I just never thought the market would turn down so much.  My value has dropped by 30% from when I purchased it.  I know that I refinanced since I purchased.    I’m aware of neighbors walking and have read that many are doing the very same.  I’m considering walking too.”

Homeowner of 1988-1990:

“I hate the fact that the market turned shortly after my purchase.   I can make the payments and ride this out even though it may be tough.  It might take several years for the values to go back up but if I live within my means I should be ok.  I love my house, my neighborhood and am part of this community”

My mother living on Capitol Hill (23rd and Prospect) in 1979-1980:

“Since the economy soured it has been tough.  My husband lost his job and has been out of work for over a year now.  It’s stressing us to be sure.  We’ve saved and been frugal.  Some of the improvements to our home will not take place.  We’ll have to forego some of the things we’d like to do and we’ll take the bus to get around or ride our bikes.  To get to soccer practice our kids will have to ride their bike, take the bus or walk.   Our kids will work after school to help defray tuition.  I’ll take on any additional work, tutor kids and earn extra money by holding swimming lessons downtown at the YWCA and YMCA in the Central District.

Christmas?  Well, we will make wreaths and Yule logs and should be able to sell quite a few.  We should make enough so that we can get a Christmas Tree on Christmas eve when the prices drop.  Although gifts will probably be few, I’ll probably make some gifts and knit some hats to keep you kids warm during our cold days.

Today (2011)  times are different.  I think back to my mother and father (Dr. Claude Fly) who got us through the great depression in Oklahoma.  This is nothing compared to that.  People of today seem to have lost the work ethic.   With my arthritis and back problems I try to hire kids to help me around our current home.   It’s hard to get them to work for an hour straight around the yard. “