Home buying tips

When I begin with a new client, I often work out a “road map” so that we can clarify a list of priorities. Along those lines, it is often important to layout a time-frame. I’ve worked with buyers who want to move into a new home in weeks and buyers who are planning ahead for months… Being realistic about when you can move into a place helps insure that everyone’s expectations are met! Also, keep in mind that it may take 30-90 days (or more) to locate the right home, secure financing, and complete the home-buying process.

Are you interested in more information? I’ve put together a Home Buying Packet (*.pdf) that lists a bunch of good information about the home buying process with sections on:

  • The Home-Buying Process
  • Home Search Criteria
  • Loan Application Checklist
  • Making an Offer
  • Contract Checklist
  • Home Inspection
  • Glossary of Real Estate Terms
  • and many more!

In filling out the form in the Home Search Criteria section it is important to distinguish between the “Need to Have

Seattle’s hot summer…

rising home prices graphThis proved to be another hot summer in Seattle as the median home price rose over 15 percent during the past year. However, the hottest local market was the Eastside where the median sale price rose over 23 percent.

On one side, I’ve talked with a few sellers who are hesitant to sell for the reason of not knowing what will they be able to afford after that sale. And on the other, I’ve noticed a large influx of people relocating to Seattle for technology-related jobs, but maybe I’m just more aware of this subset of people now that I’m running a blog.

Skyping for Real Estate

Skype The New York Times reports that EBay bought Skype for $2.6 billion yesterday.

Are you familiar with Skype?
It is a great service that I’ve been using extensively in the last few months to talk with people all over the world (and in particular my family in Russia!). The sound quality is at least as good as a land-line and definitely better than a cell phone!. And the best part is that it is free to talk to another Skype user! If you are interested in skyping me, just send me an email and I’ll happily pass along my Skype name!

One of the ways that I think Skype could be useful would be in connecting me to people thinking of moving to Seattle. If you are interested in learning more about Seattle real estate, then definitely consider connecting with me via Skype!

I know I’m not the only one thinking of using Skype for business purposes. According to NY Times their revenue is expected to grow from an estimate of $60M this year to about $ 200M in 2006. E-Bay sees this communication technology making on-line trading easier “particularly with transactions involving real estate, big-ticket purchases and services that require detailed conversations.”

“I’m a big believer in focusing brands and businesses that are in very large markets,” Ms. Whitman said by phone from London. EBay is “absolutely not” interested in developing a portal, she said. “You can be sure we’re going to focus on e-commerce.”
In addition to the basic service, about two million Skype customers have signed up for a pay service that allows them to use their computers to make calls to regular phone numbers as well as receive calls from landlines and cell phones. To complete these calls, Skype pays phone companies small per-minute fees.

They also give an interesting statistics as that only 13 percent of Skype’s users are in North America; nearly half are in Europe and another quarter are in Asia.

Some industry specialists said eBay’s purchase of Skype was a sign that voice calls would increasingly become one of many services that Internet companies would provide, rather than a stand-alone business.

“This turns the entire telecom industry picture on its head, and demonstrates that voice, presence, text messaging and other I.P.-based applications will be essential for the company of the future,” said Jeff Pulver, the chairman of pulvermedia, which promotes Internet-based phone services.

Katrina Donations Drop-off in Ballard…

Diane and Stephen of the Sip and Ship store/cafe in Ballard are organizing a donation drive for Katrina Victims and have offered to ship all appropriate donated items for free through the end of September.

What constitutes an appropriate item was not immediately appearent to me, so I emailed them to find out. Here is the response directly from the source:

We are looking for toiletries, diapers/wipes, baby formula, bottles, baby cereal/food, flashlights, batteries, and first aid kits.
Thank you for your support.
Kind regards,
Diana

Thank you Diana and Stephen for making it particularily easy for people to donate items.

If you don’t have any of these items, you can always donate money directly to the Red Cross.

Minorities paying more for loans in Seattle?

high-rate mortgagesThe Seattle Times analyzed loan applications for single-family, owner-occupied homes in 2004 from 25 of the nation’s largest lenders and concluded that minorities are paying more for loans in Seattle. The numbers show that black people in Seattle are more than four times likely to carry a high-rate mortgage than white people (13.2% vs 3.1%). However, the data also shows that black people in the rest of the country are even worse off as they are more than twice as likely to carry a high-rate mortgage than in Seattle (26.6% vs. 13.2%).

Also interesting is that the rates are not due to income differences as “low-income whites are far less likely than high-income blacks to wind up with high-interest mortgages (3.9 percent vs. 11.3 percent).” In looking for answers to why, the times speculates that differences “may be due to a variety of factors, ranging from the financial savvy of loan customers with differing backgrounds, to which lenders operate in which parts of town.”

Lyon Garden StatueI’m pretty sure that everyone reading this blog is aware that it is illegal for lenders to discriminate based on race and/or to discriminate against a neighborhood known as “redlining”. And I’m positive that all lenders are aware that this is illegal, so it makes me think that the difference must have something to do with the financial savvy of the loan customers.

What is the solution to this problem? It seems like educating the consumers of high-rate loans. Along those lines, here are some helpful links and organizations that I’m aware of:

  • Fair Loans, Fair Housing (*.pdf) by the City of Seattle that provides some advice on avoiding predatory loans.
  • Community Home Ownership Center (CHOC) (206-587-5641) CHOC provides seminars for first-time home buyers with links to statewide seminars, and also provides training for real estate agents.
  • El Centro de la Raza (206-329-7960) El Centro provides home buyer education classes in English and Spanish.
  • HomeSight (206-723-4355) HomeSight provides purchase assistance and other financial and educational information to home buyers (in Seattle, South King County and Snohomish County).
  • International District Housing Alliance (206-623-0122) Provides home buyer education and housing counseling in Vietnamese, Cambodian, Tagalog and several Chinese dialects including Cantonese, Mandarin and Taiwanese.
  • Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle (206-461-3792) Provides one-on-one counseling and monthly home buyers seminars.

If anyone is aware of any other local programs, I’d definitely be interested in hearing about them. In particular, I’d be interested in hearing about mortgage brokers that are working to educate minorities.

Thanks to Todd at Lendorama for highlighting the Seattle Times article.

Bigger homes and smaller lots?

The Seattle Times had an interesting article about how the technology changing our life style influence preferences in real estate.

In the past 25 years, the size of homes nationwide has been on the rise, while the size of lots has been shrinking. According to the U.S. Census, the median size of new single-family homes increased almost 29 percent from 1978 to 2003, but median lot size shrank 13 percent. The census does not track this information at the city or county level. Census statistics show that regionally, lots in the West have been the smallest in the country every year since 1992, the first year regional numbers were available.

Local builders and others in the residential-construction industry say declining lot size, in particular, is true for the Puget Sound region. Developers say they’re building homes on 4,500- to 5,500-square-foot lots, but older figures were unavailable for comparison.

“The most significant change we’ve seen is that the lot size is shrinking over time,” says Michael Feuerborn, owner and president of Auburn-based DreamCraft Homes. “They’re getting pretty much the same house we built 10, 15 years ago, but it’s on a smaller lot.”

Dan French, general manager and co-owner of Kirkland-based Austin Royce Design/Build, agrees.

“In the last five years, I don’t think there’s been so much increase in size [of homes] as there has been shrinkage in land,” French said.

And they give an interesting reason for such thing:

“Years ago, there was no such thing as a media room,” said Paul Glosniak, president of Bellevue-based Bennett Homes, which builds about 300 homes a year. “Now we have relatively inexpensive large-screen TVs and surround-sound systems, and people want spaces to put those in.”

With the influence of the Internet, e-mail, fax machines and high-speed Internet access, more people are telecommuting and want home offices. Glosniak sometimes builds his-and-her offices.

Lifestyle changes have made yard space less important than it once was.

“A smaller lot means ease of maintenance,” Glosniak said. “With everyone being so busy and with two people in a household working in order to afford the home, people are not wanting to do a lot of yard work, so people are accepting smaller lots as a convenience.”

Here is a summary of the US Census numbers that show how median homes have grown nearly 29 percent in the U.S. since 1978, while lots have shrunk 13 percent.

Year: Home sq. ft. / Lot sq. ft.
1978: 1,650 / 9,790
1983: 1,580 / 8,375
1988: 1,800 / 9,225
1993: 1,900 / 9,680
1998: 2,000 / 8,992
2003: 2,125 / 8,666

Latest stab at on-line mapping

Eating LeavesGalen over at shackprices alerted me to a new google maps search by Windermere. I can’t say that I’m surprised to see that Windermere updated their search since their VP of technology told me they would be releasing something soon… None the less, it is always interesting to see what gets produced. My initial reaction is that they’ve built a really clean home search tool (note that they still consider this a BETA site).

Out of the sites that I’ve seen, this is currently the best home search (MLS search) site. Some features I like:

  • As you zoom in to your area, the number of available homes (based on your search criteria) gets updated. This works real fast demonstrating that the Windermere people have thought-through their spacial analysis backend.
  • It is integrated well into the standard MLS search. Nothing will surprise someone who has searched for a home on the internet.

If you are looking for a home in Seattle, I’d highly recommend the Windermere tool. Although there is some good news for all the other people building home search sites. The Beta site that Windermere has published does not do anything really innovative, so there is still plenty of room for someone to break the field wide open. I’m still waiting for someone to use the power of the web to improve search results.

NAR Backs Down…

cenoteaThe National Association of Realtors (NAR) has been fighting a losing battle to allow real estate agents to restrict where their home listings are shown. In essence, many agents are worried that if discount brokers have access to their listings, then the commissions for all agents will drop. After being officially sued by the Justice Department yesterday, NAR released this press release that all but reversed their policy:

The National Association of Realtors® announced today it has adopted a new policy that ensures that all members of Realtor® multiple listing services will receive exactly the same MLS property listings for display on their Web sites as their competitors.

The policy will bring consumers more points of access to real estate information from multiple listing services than they have ever had before, NAR said.

On a related topic… I’ve been fascinated to watch the growth of a new blog that is put out by a splinter group within NAR called the Center for Realtor Technology (CRT). CRT has been putting out some very interesting open source software products that help agents to develop advanced websites. Reading their blog, it makes me think that NAR has chosen to keep these people inside the tent peeing out rather than outside the tent peeing in… For example, on the same day that NAR made the public release mentioned above, CRT staff wrote a blog entry titled “Does ‘Data want to be free’?” In the post, the author makes some excellent observations on how organizations tend to control data (while carefully not mentioning the NAR press release). The CRT staff seem to be working on technologies (open source, wikis, etc.) that seem way more enlightened than the typical NAR approach to solving problems.

I’m going to continue to closely follow the CRT blog, and once I get a chance to try out some of the software, I’ll definitely follow it up with a blog entry!