About Rhonda Porter

Rhonda Porter is an NMLS Licensed Mortgage Originator MLO121324 for homes located in Washington state. Her blog, The Mortgage Porter, is nationally recognized for sharing relevant information to consumers about mortgages. She has been originating mortgages since 2000 at Mortgage Master Service Corporation #40445 Consumer NMLS Website: http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org/TuringTestPage.aspx?ReturnUrl=/EntityDetails.aspx/COMPANY/40445 NMLS ID 40445. Equal Housing Opportunity. You can follow Rhonda on @mortgageporter, Facebook and/or Google+

Las Vegas Taxi Driver wants a fair deal…and I don’t want to be taken for a ride.

On one of my many trips back and forth from the BlogWorld Conventionto my hotel, a taxi driver asked me what was going on at the Las Vegas Convention Center.  I told him it was a blogging convention and I received a weird glance from his rear view mirror.   The rest of the conversation pretty much went like this:

Taxi Driver:  What do you write about?

Me: mortgages for the most part.

Taxi Driver (seeming oddly interested in this):  You actually write about mortgages?   Are you a loan officer?

Me:  Yes I originate mortgage loans and help people decide which program might best fit their needs.

At this point, the Taxi Driver is getting very excited…to the point I’m concerned he’s not paying enough attention to the road.

Taxi Driver:  What are rates right now?

Me:  Well, I’m a little out of touch because I’ve been in this convention for a few days.

Taxi Driver:  What if you had to guess?  

Me (feeling like I better give “the captain of the car” an answer):  From what I’ve been able to track, probably high 4’s to low 5’s with excellent credit scores, 20% down payment and depending on other factors like loan amount and programs…but it’s really difficult for me to say for certain.

Taxi Driver (very excited):  I’m buying a house.  Can you please take a look at my mortgage papers to make sure they look okay?

I’m beginning to wonder if he’s going to drive me to his mortgage originator’s company…he actually had his file right next to him on the front seat of the cab.   He starts waiving the file around with one hand on the steering wheel.   Of course, wanting to get to my hotel in one  piece and also not minding helping someone, I agreed.

He tells me how excited he is to buy this home and for his family to visit and that it has a pool.  He never thought he’d have a house like this.  He says he feels sorry for whoever lost the home to foreclosure.

We pull to the front of the hotel and the doormen are trying to let me out.  The gruff Taxi Driver is waiving them off.   His rate looked fine and everything seemed in order.  All that I could recommend is that he contact his mortgage originator to get a written lock confirmation.   He believes his rate is locked but there is no written documentation in the papers he had in his cab.

I’d say out of all the cabs I used in Vegas during BlogWorld, I had probably had a 40% chance of dealing with a taxi driver who would take the most direct route.   Most would “steer me wrong” in order to jack up their cab fair.    I realize that this is a much much smaller scale than someone who is buying a home and working with a mortgage originator…it’s a similar feeling (hopefully odds are improving with working with a quality mortgage professional).   

I’m glad I could help the Taxi Driver know that he had a fair deal with his mortgage–now if I could only figure out how to do that with taxi’s the next time I travel!

reblogworld, Baby!

I can’t tell you how much I’m looking forward to participating at RE Blogworld in LasVegas this week.  I feel like I’m inrebw_final “nerd-vana”…in a good way, really!   I’m going to be on a panel with Jay Thompson, Derek  Overbey and Jeff Turner moderated by Matt Fagioli.  We’re going to be the “first track” on Thursday, October 15,  covering Using Social Media for Real Estate.    And if the bantering I’ve witnessed via emails together is any indicator of what our panel should be like…it’s going to not only be informing…it should be entertaining as well.    I’m totally honored to be included with this group and to be taking part in this event.

Social media has done so much for me and my career.  I absolutely love writing for the consumer and being able to work for people I “attract”  (and my past clients) instead of having to use “cold” methods such as post cards to strangers, up-calls or paying for “leads”.   I’m looking forward to learning more ways to fine tune and streamline social media.

I hope to write a post while I’m at Blog World…I’ll have to see how things go.  Odds are that you may not be seeing rates from me on Friday.  Because I’ll be in Vegas, Baby!  🙂

FHA to Adopt HVCC-ish Guidelines effective January 1, 2010…Correction: February 15, 2010

HUD recently announced in Mortgagee Letter 2009-28 dated September 18, 2009 that they are implementing “Appraiser Independence” which is very similar to HVCC. 

Prohibition of mortgage brokers and commission based lender staff from the appraisal process…. To ensure appraiser independence, FHA-approved lenders are now prohibited from accepting appraisals prepared by FHA Roster appraisers who were selected, retained or compensated in any manner by a mortgage broker or any member of a lender’s staff who is compensated on a commission basis tied to the successful completion of a loan….

FHA does not require the use of AMCs or other third party organizations for appraisal ordering, but does recognize that some lenders use AMCs and/or other third party organizations to help ensure appraiser independence.

Mortgagee Letter 2009-28 goes on to “affirm existing requirements” with regards to preventing improper influencing of appraisers.  And states that:

“A lender must not assume, simply because an appraiser is state-certified that the appraiser is qualifed and knowledgeable in a specific market area.  It is incumbent upon the lender to determine whether an appraisers’ quaifications, as evidenced by educational training and actual field experience are sufficient to enable the appraiser to competently perform appraisals before assigning an appraisal to them.”

AMCs (and the banks who own them) will have extra reason to party-on this New Year’s Eve.  This new requirement goes into effect on all FHA case numbers assigned on or after January 1, 2010 February 15, 2010. [Update:  HUD has extended the time period before the new guidelines in the above referenced mortgagee letter goes into effect…I corrected the title of this post too!]

FHA Suspends Taylor, Bean & Whitaker

I feel like I’m one of the few mortgage originators who have never worked with mortgage giant TBW…many mortgage brokers and lenders do.   FHA’s Press release states:

“TBW is the third largest direct endorsement lender of FHA-insured loans and the eighth largest issuer of Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities.”

They are a significant mortgage company and this will impact those brokers and lenders who rely on TBW for FHA financing.   This suspension is temporary “pending the completion of an investigation by HUD’s Office of Inspector General, an ongoing review by the Department’s Office of Housing, and any legal proceedings that may ensue.”

From HUD’s News Release today:

FHA and Ginnie Mae are imposing these actions because TBW failed to submit a required annual financial report and misrepresented that there were no unresolved issues with its independent auditor even though the auditor ceased its financial examination after discovering certain irregular transactions that raised concerns of fraud. FHA’s suspension is also based on TBW’s failure to disclose, and its false certifications concealing, that it was the subject of two examinations into its business practices in the past year.

“Today, we suspend one company but there is a very clear message that should be heard throughout the FHA lending world – operate within our standards or we won’t do business with you,” said HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan.

TBW has the right to appeal, however HUD is not delaying their actions.  In addition, HUD debarment of two top executives at TBW. 

This must be leaving many borrowers and mortgage brokers scrambling for other sources to send their FHA transactions in process. 

The Federal Reserve’s proposed changes to Regulation Z (Truth in Lending)

benb

If you’ve been following Ben Bernanke’s testimony on the Hill this week, you may have noticed him hinting about significant proposed changes to Reg Z and changes in how mortgage originators are compensated, leaving many of us in the industry wondering “what now”.   Don’t get me wrong, Reg Z could use some tweeking…it’s just that the mortgage industry is in a state of constant change (evolution?) with a deluge of new forms and/or regulations including MDIA, HVCC and the new Good Faith Estimate which goes into effect on January 1, 2010.

From this morning’s Press Release:

“Our goal is to ensure that consumers receive the information they need, whether they are applying for a fixed-rate mortgage with level payments for 30 years, or an adjustable-rate mortgage with low initial payments that can increase sharply,” said Governor Elizabeth A. Duke. “With this in mind, the disclosures would be revised to highlight potentially risky features such as adjustable rates, prepayment penalties, and negative amortization.”

Closed-end mortgage disclosures would be revised to highlight potentially risky features such as adjustable rates, prepayment penalties, and negative amortization. The Board’s proposal would:

  • Improve the disclosure of the annual percentage rate (APR) so it captures most fees and settlement costs paid by consumers;
  • Require lenders to show how the consumer’s APR compares to the average rate offered to borrowers with excellent credit;
  • Require lenders to provide final Truth in Lending Act (TILA) disclosures so that consumers receive them at least three business days before loan closing; and
  • Require lenders to show consumers how much their monthly payments might increase, for adjustable-rate mortgages.

The Board will also work with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to make the disclosures mandated by TILA, and HUD’s disclosures, required by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, complementary; potentially developing a single disclosure form that creditors could use to satisfy both laws.

In developing the proposed amendments, the Board recognized that disclosures alone may not always be sufficient to protect consumers from unfair practices. To prevent mortgage loan originators from “steering” consumers to more expensive loans, the Board’s proposal would:

  • Prohibit payments to a mortgage broker or a loan officer that are based on the loan’s interest rate or other terms; and
  • Prohibit a mortgage broker or loan officer from “steering” consumers to transactions that are not in their interest in order to increase the mortgage broker’s or loan officer’s compensation.

Clarity and transparency for consumers is a must with the mortgage process.   I’m not sure what to make of this line:  “Prohibit payments to a mortgage broker or a loan officer that are based on the loan’s interest rate or other terms“.     Mortgage rates are increased or decreased based off of paying points which includes the mortgage originators compensation.    Perhaps the FOMC would like to see mortgage originators be paid hourly instead of based off of rate…I’m all for that!  🙂

Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act: New Waiting Periods on Mortgage Transactions

In an early post, Ardell wrote about the significance of a buyer being able to close quickly…new regulations may put a damper on that.   With mortgage applications taken after July 30, 2009, waiting periods will go into effect with regards to when and how disclosure forms are provided to the consumer.   The Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act (MDIA), which modifies the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), was originally going to become effective on October 1, 2009, however the effective date was moved up two months which may catch some real estate professionals by surprise.

Here are some of the details:

Good Faith Estimate and Truth in Lending Disclosures….required waiting periods.

Under MDIA, early disclosures are required for “any extension of credit secured by the dwelling of the consumer.”    Three business days from application, the consumer must receive an initial Good Faith Estimate and Truth in Lending (unless the borrower is denied at application).   

The earliest a transaction can possibly close is seven days after the initial disclosures have been issued by the lender (delivered in person, mailed, emailed, etc.).    This is assuming no re-disclosure is required.

Re-disclosure (waiting periods after the early disclosure and corrected disclosures) of the GFE/TIL are triggered if the fees and charges are more than 10%; if the APR is more than 0.125% or a change in loan terms.   Three business days must pass in the event of re-disclosure.   Re-disclosing is nothing new, it typically happened at closing–this will no longer be acceptable.    Mortgage originators “should compare the APR at consummation with the APR in the most recently provided corrected disclosures (not the first set of disclosures provided) to determine whether the creditor must provide another set of corrected disclosures”.   Double check those APRs prior to doc!

From MortgageDaily.com:

“The Commentary added by the MDIA Rule expressly provides that both the seven-business-day and three-business-day waiting periods must expire for consummation to occur.  The seven-business-day waiting  period begins when the early disclosures are delivered to the consumer or placed in the mail, and not when the consumer receives the disclosures.  The three-business-day waiting periods begin when the consumer actually receives or is deemed to receive the corrected disclosures.  If corrected disclosures are mailed, the consumer is deemed to receive the disclosures three business days after mailing.  If a creditor delivers corrected disclosures via email or by a courier other than the postal service, the creditor may rely on either proof of actual receipt or the mailing rule for purposes of determining when the three-business-day waiting period begins to run.”

Consumers have the right to waive or shorten the MDIA if “a consumer determines that an extension of credit is needed to meet a bona fide perosnal financial emergency”.  

No monies may be collected from the borrower with exception to a “bona fide and reasonable” credit report fee until they receive the initial disclosures.   This may cause a delay of when an appraisal is ordered.  Most lenders require an upfront deposit to cover the cost of the appraisal.    The collection of fees rule may also cause potential issues if a borrower is doing a certain type of lock (some with float down or extended lock periods require an upfront deposit).   NOTE:  HVCC requires the borrower receive a copy of the appraisal at least three days prior to closing.

Tim Kane can attest that there is nothing worse than a borrower learning at signing their final loan papers that the fees are significantly higher than what was originally disclosed.  I’d like to think that all mortgage originators redisclosed WHEN modifications to the transaction/fees take place…obviously, this has not been the case.  

DFI covers MDIA here

Re-disclosures could become a “holy hand grenade” to quick closings.

My “Talking” Good Faith Estimate

Ardell asked me to share with you how I present Good Faith Estimates to my clients when I’m not meeting with them face to face…and believe or not, most of my clients I never have the pleasure of meeting.   We do most of our conversation via email or over the phone.    When possible, I like to include a presentation where I review the good faith estimate for the client section by section.  

Here’s an example from a transaction a few months ago where my clients were buying utilizing an FHA mortgage with minimum down payment.

The program I use is called Jing and you have up to 5 minutes to record your presentation (I was pushing my time with this presentation…you might be able to tell that I’m trying to wrap it up at the end).   The uses for this program are endless.

This does take some extra time to prepare an estimate…but I think it’s worth it!

FHFA Gives the Green Light for 125% LTVs on HARP Refi’s

The Federal Housing Finance Agency just issued a press release that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are authorized to expand the Home Affordable Refinance Program to 125% loan to value.  The existing limit is 105%. 

From FHFA Director James Lockhart:

“The higher LTV refinancings will allow more homeowners to strengthen their finances by taking advantage of lower mortgage rates. The Enterprises are also incenting these borrowers to combine a lower mortgage rate with a faster amortization schedule, which will enable them to get ‘above water’ on their mortgages more quickly. This program could assist many homeowners who otherwise would have difficulty refinancing due to declining house prices”.
 
As I’m writing this post, I’m receiving an annoucement from Fannie Mae:

“This expansion will help lenders serve more borrowers with a demonstrated track record of paying their mortgages, but who have been unable to refinance due to significant property value declines.”

Part of this program is to encourage home owners to opt for mortgage terms amortized for less than 30 years to help them get back to being “above water”.

“In conjunction with the LTV expansion, Fannie Mae is offering a 0.50 percentage point reduction in the loan-level price adjustment (LLPA) charged for manually underwritten Refi Plus loans with LTVs above 105 percent and loan terms greater than 15 years up to 25 years. “

Fannie Mae will begin accepting delivery of loan to values over 105% using Refi Plus on September 1, 2009.   Refi Plus requires the borrower to return to the mortgage servicer (who they make their payments to).   Fannie Mae’s email stated they are “evaluating potential updates to Desktop Underwriter® to allow LTV ratios above 105 percent” meaning allowing those of us who utilize DU to be able to originate HARP refi’s up to 125% loan to value.

I’ve wondered why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac require an appraisal on a HARP refi.  If the home owner is credit and income worthy, why not just refinance the mortgage without factoring loan-to-value?   It’s one less foreclosure for the banks to deal with and you’re keeping someone in a home they want to be in.   It could also stabilize values in neighborhoods and prevent people from “walking away” and/or trashing the property.   The mortgage servicer all ready is exposed to risk with the higher loan to value and may be reducing their risk by making the mortgage more affordable to the home owner.   Just a thought…

Calculating Income of Employed W2 Borrowers for Mortgage Qualifying

Jillayne wrote a post about the upcoming national licensing exam that mortgage originators will have to take and pass (unless they work for a depository institution) due to the SAFE Act.   She provided examples of questions that may be on the exam.  One of them is how to calculate income–which is receiving quite a few comments on her post.

If an applicant works 40 hours every week and is paid $13.52 per hour, what is the applicant’s
monthly income?
(A) $2,163.20
(B) $2,343.47
(C) $2,379.52
(D) $2,487.68

The correct way to calculate this is 13.52 x 40 hours x 52 weeks divided by 12 months = (B) $2,343.47.   The mortgage originator should also review the last two years W2’s to make sure the income is steady or increasing.   If it’s decreasing, this will need to be explained and the income may be averaged or a lower income may be used.   For example, if the borrower recently had their hours cut due to the economy, the new lower figure will most likely be used.   What’s most important is steady hours for the hourly employee…a recent jump in hours may not be considered either.

It’s important that the borrower has a minimum of a two year history in their line of work in order to be able to use the income (secondary education may be able to count towards the two year requirement).   If someone started a second job one year ago as a waitress for supplemental income, it might not meet the criteria to be factored towards income unless the borrower had a second job in the same industry over the past two years.

Overtime and bonus income needs to be received for the past two years to be factored for qualifying as well.   Again, this boils down to stability and trends with income are heavily considered.    

Commission incomes (W2) requires a two year history as well and the income is averaged.  If a borrower’s commission income is more than 25% of their annual income, they’re treated more like a self-employed borrower.  They’ll need to provide their last two years complete tax returns and non-reimbursed business expenses that are claimed on the tax return will be deducted from the gross income (they’re treated more like a self-employed borrower).  A situation that I’ve seen is where a borrower was paid a salary and then received a promotion where they had greater earning potential.   The employer reduced their base and added a commission structure.   Because the commission was a new feature to the income, only new lower base income was used for qualifying.

It all pretty much boils down to showing stability over the past 24 months and recent trends when calculating income.   Also be prepared to complete a Form 4506–even if you’re paid salary–as a measure to prevent fraud.   Lenders may also require a Verification of Employment with your employer to confirm the information provided regarding employment, income is accurate and that employment is likely to continue prior to funding your new mortgage.

There are many other types of income–for purposes of keeping this post short, sweet and simple, I’ve stuck to income that’s reported via a W2 and a “full doc” loan.  

Hopefully you’re working with a Mortgage Professional who reviews your income documentation upfront and calculates it correctly…and I hope you’re quickly providing the information that is being requested so that you’re properly qualified in the beginning of the process.   Nobody likes to get involved with a transaction to find out that the underwriter is not going to use the income that was used on the application because it was figured incorrectly.

Questions?  Ask!  🙂

No Big Rate Surprise with the FOMC

The FOMC wrapped up their two day meeting leaving the Funds Rate unchanged.   The target rate is remaining at 0-0.25%.  Now that this decision has been formally announced, everyone will be reviewing the Fed’s statement for clues on when they will begin to raise the Fed Funds Rate.

From today’s FOMC Statement:

…the Committee expects that inflation will remain subdued for some time.

As previously announced, to provide support to mortgage lending and housing markets and to improve overall conditions in private credit markets, the Federal Reserve will purchase a total of up to $1.25 trillion of agency mortgage-backed securities and up to $200 billion of agency debt by the end of the year. In addition, the Federal Reserve will buy up to $300 billion of Treasury securities by autumn.

In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote economic recovery and to preserve price stability.  The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.