Start searching on ShackPrices.com

[photopress:ShackPrices.gif,thumb,alignright]As of midnight last night, ShackPrices.com is live. We have a post up on the ShackBlog about what you’ll find on our new site, but I’ll summarize it for our readers here:

What is ShackPrices?

[photopress:map_sample.jpg,thumb,alignleft]ShackPrices.com is a snappy Google maps-based real estate search site that makes finding a home better by augmenting each real estate listing with data about what is nearby, including the distances to nearby landmarks, nearby schools and nearby bus stops. ShackPrices also helps home buyers learn about cities and neighborhoods through reviews, statistics and photos. Home buyers can search for shacks (shabby to chic, of course) across all of Western Washington on ShackPrices.com.

What makes ShackPrices.com different?

[photopress:tabs_1_2_3_4.jpg,full,alignright]You’ll spot some obvious things that differentiate ShackPrices.com right off the bat, including information about what is nearby every listing (check out the surroundings near this Ballard listing) and Suggested Shacks, which predicts houses home buyers might be interested in if they like any of the 20,000+ houses for sale on ShackPrices.com.

ShackPrices is still in its infancy, so expect more handy features in the coming year and please let us know how we can improve your experience.

History of Realtor.com?

Since I know there is more than a little bit of interest among RCG readers with regard to Realtor.com, I thought I’d point people to this video interview I just posted with Phil Dawley (Move’s Chief Technical Officer) and also one of the first employees. (direct link to video)

BTW, I’m up for more of these interviews, so please feel free to suggest people/topics/questions…

Hey mortgage guys and gals!!

Fed holds key interest rate at 5.25%

Can someone report on rates today please, by commenting to this post?  I hear they are the lowest since 1/1/06, is that true?

Can some of you email me for consideration as an RCG contributor?  We REALLY, REALLY NEED a couple of mortgage background RCG Contributors. Email me off site at Ardell@SoundRealty.biz

Thanks…running to show a couple of properties…will check when I return. 

 

Zillow, Redfin and "Us"

[photopress:gorilla.jpg,thumb,alignright]Take a really close look at that Gorilla protecting the baby in his hand. 

The Gorilla could be NAR, with the baby representative of every Realtor in the Country.  The Gorilla could be the MLS system, with the baby representative of each and every one of its members.  The Gorilla could be a MEGA Broker, with the baby representative of the agents who work there.

But when is the baby representative of the Average Joe Consumer?  Where is the consumer “group” working as hard for the consumer, as each of those mentioned above, works hard for the real estate practitioner? 

Theoretically it is each state, and the licensing and agency laws of each state..  Clearly State Laws and Regulatory Boards are as big as that Gorilla, but how much do they really keep up with the changes in the industry enough, to propel the consumer to new heights?  Does the State really fight hard for the consumer in these changeing times?  Obviously not.  Which is why the “Consumer’s 100 lb. Gorilla” of the moment, is the Department of Justice and their suit against the National Association of Realtors. 

Redfin, Zillow, Zip Realty, For Sale by Owner in the MLS companies, these all represent the newer “alternative” business models who represent the Balance of Power for the Consumer.  They represent the Checks and Balances needed, to offer TRUE competition in the market place, from the consumer’s standpoint.  As an industry, we should not be playing “my gorilla can beat your gorilla”.  We should not be hoping the consumer gorilla’s fail, nor should we be doing anything to assist in their failure.  We should actually be HELPING the consumer gorilla get bigger and bigger, by meeting them in the middle.  Clearly there is room for at least 20% of the marketplace to be pulling toward the consumer’s side of this equation, isn’t there?

Why?  Why should “Traditional Brokers” HELP the Alternative Business Models to succeed?  Because WE NEED them, now more than ever, all of us.  The consumer needs them.  The industry needs them.  We need a whole lot more flavors of Kool-Aid out there.  Those of us who support alternative business models, are not “Realtor-Enemies”, as some call us.  We simply are acknowledging, what the DOJ is acknowledging.  We can NO LONGER PRETEND that “price-fixing” and “boycotting” doesn’t exist in this industry, by refusing to discuss the topic and sticking our heads in the proverbial sand.

I don’t know the total answer.  But I think that maybe every MEGA Broker should have a “Nordstrom’s and Nordstrom’s Rack” equivalent.  To some extent they do, by having the Premier Homes sub-section of the company, for Elite Homes.  Maybe it’s time to take that a step further, with the “Elite Homes” being the full commission, full service division of the company, and each should also have a “Discount Division” that offers break out plans and fees.  Maybe the Elite Division only has agents with at least three years of experience, and the Discount Division has the newbies…I like that.  More transparency there…isn’t there?

Brand new agent equals 1/2 the cost…something like that.  The same way some choose to go to a Dental School at a discount, or Hairdresser School at a discount.  Traditional companies can separate the newbies into a discounted service for the consumer who doesn’t want or need so much experience and cost.  Or better yet…let’s not use number of YEARS in the business, but number of closed transactions.  First ever transaction for agent equals lowest price.  Elite division equals 100 transactions or more at top dollar.  I like that better.

Someone with 10 years could have 15 sales…someone with two years could have 80 sales…so number of sales is my vote. Give the consumer a discount for using a newer agent, the same way you get a discount for using the hairdresser who has only touched a few heads with a scissor.

Instead of fighting the alternative models, every Traditional Company could EMULATE some of the great things about these companies, so that we all meet somewhere in the middle.

Competitors/Competitive/Competition??

[photopress:odd_duck.jpg,thumb,alignright]I totally get, after 16 years, that I am an “Odd Duck” when it comes to this topic.  I truly have never gotten why agents seem to feel that Real Estate is an overly-competitive industry, relative to other fields of endeavor.

I rarely run into a competiton factor.  So I’d like to suggest to those who do, that maybe they are creating that scenario somehow, as in “What you resist, persists.”  Maybe you invite the issue of competition into your discussion with consumers, more than I do.  I’m not sure why I don’t run into competition as often as others seem to, but maybe by starting a “thread” on this topic, I can help some others deal with “fear of competition”.  In many ways, those who dislike/fear the new alternative business models, do that because they feel somehow it will impact them, when that is not at all the case, as I see it anyway.

Where do you all run into competition?  Seller calls me, for instance.  Wants to talk to me about selling their house.  I go to their house and talk about their house and how we (they and I) will sell their house.  That’s all.  Where does the topic go to some “competition” issue?  It doesn’t for me.  Are you, the agent, bringing the issue of “other agents” into the conversation you are having with the owner of the house?  And if so, why are you doing that?  If someone wants to talk to ten other agents before and after talking with me, that’s their business and not mine.  Usually they just hire me.  Once in a blue moon they don’t hire me and more often I say “Thanks but no thanks”, but mostly we, the seller and I, just get cracking at the work to be done to get the house ready for sale.  Where does this whole “competition” thing start and why?

Next example, buyer calls me and is considering hiring me as their Buyer’s Agent.  We meet and I decide if I want to work with them and they decide if they want to work with me.  That usually takes one meeting, sometimes two.  Once in a while I refuse to meet with them, but not very often.  One last week wanted a complete list of every transaction I did this year including all of my clients’ phone numbers!  That was a “thanks but no thanks” and I cancelled our first meeting.  But that is rare.  If my “competitors” are willing to hand over all of their clients’ phone numbers to a complete stranger at first contact…oh well!!  No skin off my nose, as they say.

Once a client is my client…that’s pretty much that.  Had a guy call me Saturday morning on his way out to ski, wanted to buy something he saw up in Whatcom County.  We talked for three minutes and I took care of it.  There we go.  Contract about signed around while he was off having fun.  Where’s my competitor there?  I have clients call me from all over the place like that.  We’re in Florida and saw a…  Hi, do you remember me, I want to sell now.  I get calls like this all the time.  How does a “competitor” make it into your conversation with people?

Again, I know I’m the odd duck on most issues regarding our industry…my thoughts on blogging included!!  I’m the  odd duck in that photo trying to figure out what everyone’s squabbling about up on that log 🙂  I’d love to hear from agents who think this is a competitive business.  Is this just perception and fear?  Or is it truly a reality in your every day life?  And if it is your reality and not mine, why is that? Even when I’m training and coaching agents…we don’t talk about “the competition”.  Rarely comes up.  Is it insecurity?  Is it just that I’m dense and SHOULD be talking about “the competition”.  I truly don’t get all of the chatter about all of the competition. Hundreds of people buy homes every month, probably thousands every month.  You only work with 2-5 in a month.  Sounds like damned good odds to me?  Where am I “off”on this? 

For Sale By Owner Advice

[photopress:contracts.jpg,thumb,alignright]The most common obstacle to being successful at selling your home on your own, on your own meaning a truly private sale with no agent at either end, is the contract phase.

Owners usually figure out all of “their stuff”.  Getting the house ready. Pricing the house. Putting out ads.  Being available to show the house.  The “missing” part is the “buyer’s stuff”.  While it may seem that the buyer should figure out their end of things…that is not a realistic expectation on the part of the seller, most of the time.  It is also the reason that many “successful” For Sale By Owner’s only end up saving a portion of the commission, and not the entire commission.  I have heard many stories over the last couple of decades from For Sale By Owners saying “everyone loves the house and then leaves, and we don’t hear from them again”.  That can be very frustrating for a homeowner.  The buyers come, rave about the house, leave, and the owner is left scratching their head saying “What’s up with that?!?!”

Whether a buyer is working with an agent or not, they usually focus more on looking at houses, than on what happens when they find the house they like.  Unless your house is so hands down, oh my god, have to have it…it is unlikely that a buyer will have the supercharged motivation needed to get to the next step.  Timing is everything.  If the owner whips out a contract when a buyer comes in…it may scare the buyer.  If they don’t whip it out before the buyer leaves, often the owner doesn’t get a second chance.

So here’s my advice.  Find a lawyer who will draft a simple, layman-term version of a standard purchase and sale contract for you.  Something an average buyer can REALLY UNDERSTAND, that covers all of the bases in something less than the standard legalese.  Make it on as few papers as possible, while still covering the main points.  Do NOT, in other words, simply use the standard format that agents use with multiple addendums.  Have most of the “addendum” topics covered in one standard contract.  If your house was built prior to 1978, have the lead based paint automatically built into the contract.  We use an addendum for that because some need it and some don’t.  But you already KNOW if your house was built prior to 1978…so get it put right into the contract, and have the booklet regarding hazard info readily available.

Instead of waiting for the buyer to have to say “I’d like to buy your house”, hand everyone who comes through, a sealed envelope with the flyer attached to the outside of it.  In the envelope include the Seller Disclosure Statement and the contract (and a pre-inspection, and…).  Complete the contract with everything that YOU want.  In other words, you make an offer to them…rather than waiting for them to make an offer to you.  Have the name and phone number of the attorney who drafted the contract in the envelope, so they can counter with modifications to your pre-presented offer.  Of course you should also state that they can use an attorney of their choice, OR call the attorney who drafted your document. 

When you hand them the envelope, tell them “everything you may need is in this envelope, including everything we know about the house”.  This way you are giving them information, instead of pressuring them with regard to buying your home.  If they like your house at all, they will want to open that envelope to see the Seller Disclosure Statement.

You might say as they are leaving, “If you are not at all interested, then I’d appreciate your leaving the envelope here to save a tree.”  A nice, easy way for them to let you know that they are not interested in buying your house, without offending you.  They are not saying NO to you, they are saving a tree 🙂

Make it as easy as possible for a buyer to get from liking your house to buying your house, and you may be able to save not just half of…but the entire, commission.

Redfin's Maven of "The Mavens"

[photopress:hoffman__s.jpg,full,alignright] What a lovely unexpected surprise! When Kevin Boer of Three Oceans called to ask if we could have coffee during his whirlwind tour of Seattle, we “group dated” with Redfin’s Marie Hagman. Redfin’s new “Maven of the Mavens” I’ve already signed up to get an auto email with every new “Sweet Digs” entry. It automatically comes up as San Francisco, so be sure to hit the drop down menu and put in Seattle.

Marie assures us that the seven bloggers selected from the 300 or so that replied to Redfin’s Craig’s List Ad, just turned out to be ALL WOMEN destined to be in the running for next year’s Top Ten! Hey, that only leaves three spots for all of the rest of us.

Redfin’s Rule stated that none of the bloggers could be real estate licensees. Sweet Digs is very cool, and very much the answer to Galen’s prayers. As non-licensees they are free from all of the weight and chains of rules, rules and more rules, and they are just blogging away to their heart’s content. And I DO mean their “heart’s content” as all were chosen, Marie included, based on their passion for anything real estate and their ability to write with that same passion.

And OH MY GOD!…the Eastside Sweet Digger is Jessi Princiotto…cool enough to have her photo taken by cell phone while in the car…I can’t wait to meet her…I can’t wait to read her…and my side of town to boot!! How lucky can I get! My East Coast fix and local real estate reading all wrapped into one!

Congratulations ladies. Marie and Jessi, we’re calling ahead to Hoffman’s for that torte…just name the day and time.

Oh, and Kevin and Kim were there too LOL. My partner Kim Harris (far right in the photo) and Kevin Boer (left of Kim). Kevin is definitely going home with some stories, and hopefully some insight, into how very different the Seattle Market is from his neck of the woods.

Kevin asked, “What do you say when a ‘Redfin Buyer’ calls and says, “I want to see your listing RIGHT NOW!!”, LOL. I answered “Same thing I say to ANY buyer who says I want to see your listing RIGHT NOW!!” Redfin Buyers don’t exactly grow horns, by definition. We had a fun chat. This is Seattle, very few times do we meet people that are ornery, nasty or unreasonable. It’s a great town with a lot of great people…even “Redfin Buyers”.

Have a safe trip back to CA, Kevin! Great meeting you and thanks for the intro to Marie.

Faster than fast, Quicker than quick, Ka-chow!

While spending quality time w/ the Cars addict in my family (the 3 year old who says “I wanna see the race car movie Daddy”) got me thinking about something that moves faster than Lightning McQueen, the relentless march of high technology.

A couple weeks ago, Real Central VA, had a link to an interesting NAR Center for REALTOR Technology survey on what agents/brokers plan to spend on technology.

Some of the more interesting findings were

  • 95% of agents use digital cameras
  • 90% of them use cell phones
  • 77% of them use PCs
  • 71% have web business sites
  • 60% of agents have IDX search features on their web site
  • Sites with IDX listings generate more leads than sites without listings.
  • 30% of agents spent more than $2000 on technology in 2005
  • Less than 15% of those participating in lead generation programs are satisfied with the results.
  • 67% of agents want their broker to expand their technology offerings.
  • 84% of agents want the MLS to expand the technology and service offered.
  • Most internet leads come from broker web sites or agent web sites
  • Realtor.com was the 3rd largest source of internet leads
  • The Internet is the third most important source of leads (after referrals and repeat business), it is surprising that the majority of agents spent less than $500 to build or maintain their website, and that a super majority of brokers (67%) spent less than $1,000.

The net take away for me was that agents and brokers have an appetite for technology second only to MindCamp attendees, and yet the vast majority of them probably spend more money at Starbucks in given year than they do on their web sites! Given the importance of internet leads, the effectiveness of broker / agent web sites in capturing them, the disappointing effectiveness of lead generation problems, and appetite for more technology it seems to me that the industry on a whole is seriously under investing in technology. There are exceptions of course, but it seems that real estate tech spending is going to have to trend up. Otherwise the tech leaders around here, both inside & outside the industry (RedFin, John L Scott, CB Bain, Zillow, Trulia, etc) will increasingly make real estate professionals look like real estate amateurs.

So where are your tech dollars going in the next year? How much do you plan on spending? How will technology change how and where you use your marketing budgets? More Zillow, Craigslist, and Google ads, and less paper-based ones?

Zillow's Free Advertising – A Consumer Perspective

[photopress:warning.jpg,thumb,alignright] Before everyone jumps into the pool, every agent and owner must “LOOK before they LEAP”.

The Zillow Zestimate WILL appear, of course, in the same space as your “Property For Sale” listing. The printed data is also picking up the erroneous square footage info and number of bedrooms and baths from the tax records. So far it would appear that the owner can edit this data, but not the agent for the owner. Still playing with that.

Clearly, no agent should be listing a home where the Zestimate is less than the Asking Price, without first consulting with the owner, as I did last night BEFORE 9 p.m., having seen the proto-type last week. I am not particularly alarmed by this variance, but clearly the Zestimate being higher, rather than lower, would be a PLUS! 🙂 Attempting to turn a blind eye to the Zestimate, by not posting your home for sale there is no answer. Not here in the Seattle area where 82% of the buying public is likely to have seen the Zestimate, whether you invite them to do so or not. Seattle PI: “The company’s internal numbers (Zillow’s) indicate that 3.2 million people visited the site in November and that 82 percent of all homes in King County (WA) have been viewed on Zillow in the last 10 months.”

It is quite possible that the whole valuation process will pull in the direction of Zestimates, particularly in areas like ours with so many tech savvy buyers. In fact, I am already seeing a move in that direction for many properties on market and ones sold recently.

Whether or not you choose to post your home for sale on Zillow.com, these are issues facing everyone involved in real estate transactions. Buyers are making offers with the Zestimate price. Sellers and Agent’s for sellers will need to learn how to calculate the variance with some level of credible accuracy.

One of the reason’s David G. and Jeff, of Zillow, my parter Kim and I, met last week to review the new product, was to view first hand some of these potential pitfalls. While I did notice the Zestimate vs. Sale Price issue, the square footage discrepancy did not pop out at me during the presentation.

“Supporting New Business Models” and being an “Agent for Change” requires that someone jump in first to test the waters and assist with these little blips from the getgo, and not without the owner’s permission to do so.

To Galen, who notes that it is difficult to simply load up listings en masse, perhaps this is fair warning that adding a home for sale should NOT be done en masse. Every agent and every owner must consider the potential consequences of showing the Zestimate price side by side against their Asking Price, and be prepared to justify the basis for the differences between the two with regard to square footage, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, finished vs. unfinished space, etc. and price.

This “FREE ADVERTISING” and the info contained “in the AD” is not entirely editable by the owner and the owner’s agent…so far anyway. I’m still working on it. Not a small matter, and one that must be addressed rather quickly if Zillow’s erroneous data is going to show side by side the owner’s “corrected” data.

So what did I forget to ask David G. last week? Did Pearl Harbor Day come up in any conversations concerning Zillow’s choice of unveiling the new upgrade? Did unveiling it at 9 p.m. on the 6th, camouflage any refererence to December 7th, when most would be waking up to see “God-Zillow” in their sheets with the morning paper?