Mortgage Brokers and Loan Originators Will Owe Fiduciary Duties to Consumers

…in Washington state. It’s only a matter of time: The Washington State House and Senate have both passed SB 6381. The March 4th House vote was 93 Yeas, 0 Nays, 0 Absent, 5 Excused.

This bill will now go to Governor Gregoire’s desk where she will likely sign it.

There are other state legislative changes on the horizon including SB 6452 which takes aim at yield spread premiums, requiring mortgage brokers/LOs to refund the difference between any YSP that was quoted at application time, and the final YSP earned at escrow, essentially wiping out a way for a broker/LO to earn a higher fee if interest rates go down on the wholesale side, but the consumer, being unaware of how the mortgage market works, is fine with a higher rate. This bill is still in committee but also looks likely to pass. Yes, yes, I know YSP can be helpful for consumers who do not want to pay any closing costs. The ability to structure loans this way is not effected. Instead, the ability for a broker/LO to earn a higher YSP than initially disclosed would go away. The majority of brokers and LOs I talk to do not have a problem with SB 6452. It makes the broker’s compensation transparent. Those who are able to justify their fee are completely fine with being accurate and honest up front in regards to their compensation.

SB 6381 on the other hand, will radically change the way brokers and loan originators interact with the consumer.

Fiduciary duties does not mean a broker/LO will have to promise to obtain the best rate or the lowest fees or the best loan program. Instead this means the broker/LO will be required to put their client’s interests ahead of their own interests to make the loan. Fiduciary duties will be the subject of great debate during the next many months after the Governor signs this bill and it is sent to the state regulators for rule-making hearings.

Interestingly, there is a small sentence at the end of this bill that is largely going unnoticed by the broker/LO community because of the fear of the unknown surrounding fiduciary duties:

“A mortgage broker may contract for or collect a fee for services rendered if the fee is disclosed to the borrower in advance of the provision of those services.”

Earning a fee for service changes, for the better, how brokers and LOs could be compensated. Right now, a broker/LO can only earn a fee if a loan is made (with some very minor exceptions.) This compensation system creates a structure where brokers/LOs are externally rewarded for making lots of loans, whether or not a mortgage loan is in the best interest of the client.

fdutiesMany (not all) Brokers/LOs spend countless hours in a consulting and education role helping homeowners restructure their finances, improve their credit score, and so forth. However, the broker/LO cannot earn a fee for such services. ONLY when a loan is made can they earn a fee.

That will change after this bill goes into effect.

The consequences will be a separation of the men from the boys and the women from the girls. Those with the knowlege, skills, education, patience, experience, and other highly honed consultive skills will be able to charge more for their services and they will be worth it.

Memorizing sales scripts for how to “close” the customer is so 2007.

New FHA Mortgage Limits

Hot off the press for single family dwellings, revised FHA Loan Limits:

King County, Snohomish and Pierce Counties
Single Family: $567,500
Two Family: $726,500
Three Family: $878,150
Four Family: $1,091,350

FHA mortgages allow for minimum down payment (roughly 3%) and does require FHA mortgage insurance.

The Wall Street Journal reports that “the [FHA] upper mortgage limits also will apply to loans purchased or guaranteed by government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHA officials said”

More information to follow soon. 🙂 I just had to share this breaking news.

Life in escrow: When we compete with American Idol.

There is only so much escrow can do when escrow receives loan docs at 5pm and the borrower must sign because an interest rate lock is about to expire and the rescission period puts their back against the wall, forcing them to sign the very same day (evening). Then the borrower (s), strangely unaware of the urgency, indicates:

1. Can you come to our house between 7:00-7:30 because American Idol is on at 8pm (like tonight, cough-cough) and we can’t miss it. Or, how about after the program is over?

or,

2. I drop Billy off at Basketball at 6:30 and pick him up at 7:30, so I won’t be home until 8:15 pm. Will 8:30 pm work for you? Oh, my spouse needs to sign as well? He does not get off his shift until midnight. Is that a problem?

Will these transactions close on time? If you do what Ardell suggests in Step #2, it is a sure thing..

I’m beginning to muster up the courage to ask management for new business hours: M-F 8-5pm; quick hour break for a run to Panda Express, sprint any last minute disbursed loan Payoff’s to the UPS terminal blocks from our office to make it on an airplane to wherever, do banking before the bank closes at 6pm; hustle back to the office, quickly re-check e-mail for more “last minute” loan docs promised days earlier, and then re-open from 6pm until midnight for signings from Bellingham to Olympia to Ephrata. Sat. and Sun. leave wide open for signings too.

Should you lose your Earnest Money?

It’s not a good time to look at this issue from a hindsight perspective. In this changing market, we need to revisit this topic and talk about how a changing market may influence your decisions and actions in 2008.

In a hot market, the instances of the seller wanting to keep your Earnest Money are fewer. When there’s another buyer standing in line behind you, sellers will often simply say NEXT!

But when buyers making offers are fewer and further between, you will see more sellers wanting to keep that Earnest Money. Time to address this topic from a forward thinking perspective in “better safe than sorry” fashion.

Step 1) The amount of the Earnest Money. When a buyer makes an offer they “put up” Earnest Money. Most buyers will ask, “How much does it NEED to be?” That is really not the way to look at it. Instead ask yourself, “How much am I willing to LOSE?” The purpose of Earnest Money is to get some skin into the game. It’s how you show the seller that you are making the offer “in earnest” and willing to proceed “in good faith” to closing. So DO NOT write that Earnest Money check expecting to get it back if you change your mind! You never should have of course. But it may become more likely in 2008 that sellers will want to keep that money, than they did in the last 4 years or more.

NEW RULE! Don’t write that check for an amount more than you are willing to lose, if you simply change your mind about buying that house. The seller and seller’s agent may counter and ask for more, as they should if it is low. But don’t agree to an increased amount until you again ask yourself, “am I REALLY willing to LOSE this much if I change my mind?”

Step 2) Choosing Your Closing Agent (Escrow) In a Seller’s Market you will often see instructions from the seller’s agent regarding which Title and Escrow Company you are to use when writing an offer. In a hot market you likely won’t want to lose the house arguing over this point. But when you are the only offer in the room on a house that has been on market long enough to feel comfortable that you can bargain in a reasonable manner, choose your escrow company wisely.

Whether it is the Closing Agent or the Real Estate Broker holding your Earnest Money, you want to make sure that they honor unilateral rights to cancel BEFORE you agree to make out that Earnest Money check payable TO them.

So what does that mean? It means sometimes the buyer has a unilateral right to cancel, but the escrow holder has an “internal policy” of requiring the signatures of both parties to release the Earnest Money. Many, if not most, very large escrow companies do not want to take the risk of releasing the Earnest Money to the buyer unless the seller agrees. Sometimes you need the seller to agree and sometimes you don’t. If the escrow holder won’t give you the money because of their internal policy vs. the Purchase and Sale Agreement, you may find yourself talking to a wall instead of getting your money back.

NEW RULE! Pick not only your escrow company, but also speak with your closing agent BEFORE writing that Earnest Money check. Ask your agent writing the contract for your “legal out” addendums in advance. For example, if you are buying a condo, ask for a copy of the blank form you would use to cancel based on the resale certificate. Ask for the form you would use to cancel based on the Form 17 (and do not waive your right to do so in advance). If you have an Inspection Contingency, ask for the form that you would use to cancel based on the Inspection Congingency. Whatever your legal outs, know that most will expire early in the contract. So mark down the drop dead dates of your rights within these legal outs.

Notice whether or not the form requires only your signature to release the Earnest Money, or the signatures of both the buyer and the seller. Let’s assume that these forms only require the signature of the buyer, and the buyer has the unilateral right to cancel. NOW call the proposed Earnest Money holder and verify that they WILL in fact return your Earnest Money with only your signature, in the event you cancel based on one of these uniteral addendums.

If and when you ask someone to agree, they think they have the right to not agree. So if you have say 5 days to cancel, you don’t want the seller to have to agree with your decision in order for you to get your money back. If the escrow company won’t give you your money based solely on the Purchase and Sale Agreement and it’s addendums…well let’s just say you don’t want to be in that position, so know that up front and before you give them your money.

It is not a good time to “go gentle into that good night” and simply not care who the escrow company will be. While you should be prepared to lose your Earnest Money in some cases, one of those cases is not because of an internal escrow company policy.

Do not rely on your Finance Contingency as a means to change your mind. Return of Earnest Money based on the Finance Contingency is rarely, if ever, covered under a unilateral rescission right, as are some other areas of the contract. Often if not always, the seller needs to agree to the release of Earnest Money if you are cancelling based on the Finance Contingency. It’s a good idea to be pretty darned sure you CAN get a mortgage before making an offer. The protection of earnest money often does not go all the way to closing, and so if the loan doesn’t fund at the end on a day that is not covered by the Finance Contingency, or if you didn’t to EVERYTHING in a timely manner…you need to consult an attorney. Sellers will be less likely to say “oh well” in a Buyer’s Market than in a Seller’s Market.

3) When you SHOULD lose your Earnest Money. If you change your mind about buying the house because you have now decided you don’t want it, the seller should keep your Earnest Money. That is the purpose of requiring Earnest Money. You promise to buy the seller’s house, and if you change your mind he gets to keep the Earnest Money. You say, “Here’s $5,000. This is proof that I do ‘sincerely and in earnest’ want to buy your house. If I change my mind, you get to keep that $5,000.” That is what Earnest Money is all about.

Some will say the seller wasn’t damaged, so why should he keep a dime of my money? You have two elections in the contract. “Forfeiture of Earnest Money” or “Seller’s Election of Remedies”. Most times the contract calls for “Forfeiture of Earnest Money”. That means the seller gets your money…period, if you “default”. The seller doesn’t have to prove he was damaged, nor does he even have to be damaged. To talk about damages, you have to have been willing to risk MORE than the Earnest Money at the time you made the offer, and most people don’t do that.

Most people don’t want to pay the seller’s full damages, nor do the want to forfeit their earnest money. So really they want an election that says, “None of the above! I just want my money back!” Doesn’t work that way.

You will see more and more sellers wanting to keep that money than in the past. Why? Because another buyer is not as easy to come by as it was in the last few years. Before you go to an attorney to get your Earnest Money back, maybe you should first look at yourself in the mirror and ask yourself if the seller should get to keep it. If you just changed your mind, “without legal excuse”, remember that is why you put that money up in the first place.

How Quickly Guidelines Change

When WaMU decided that most of Washington State zip codes are soft, they let Loan Originators know via email giving us just hours to submit loans under the old guidelines (pre-soft haircut of 5% or what ever the value is). I have another example of how little time we are given as LO’s to deal with changing guidelines in our industry. Keep in mind when you read this, this is from one lender: these programs/products are still available with other lenders.

At 6:42 a.m. this morning, I received an email from MortgageIt, a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, announcing the following:

Dated 2/29/2008

Effective Friday, February 29, 2008 [last Friday]…

Discontinuation of the following products in their entirety:

FHMLC Home Possible

FNMA MyCommunity Mortgage

FNMA FLEX [All Fannie Mae Flex programs]

Loans APPROVED at this time of this notification that are negatively affected by the modifications (i.e. approved under the old guidelines) may still lock through the end of business Monday, March 3, 2008 for a maximum of 15 days at current rate/pricing.

Locked loans that re not approved at this time of this notification will have the price honored and may be underwritten to the old guidelines up to the original lock expiration date ONLY IF the loan package is submitted to the branch NO LATER than end of business Monday, March 3, 2008.

All loans must be closed and funded within the original lock expirations; RELOCKS AND EXTENSIONS WILL NOT BE GRANTED….

Again…this is just an example from one lender. What does this mean to me and other lenders? Obviously we won’t be using MortgageIt for these programs…we couldn’t if we wanted to. Other lenders are still offering (as of today) these programs. Much like WaMU declaring most of Washington soft…other lenders are not yet. Mortgage Professionals will opt for lenders who will provide the most options for our clients. Why work with a bank/lender who’s going to discount home values 5% when others are not?

This particular memo was backdated to Friday…or the email I received was distributed late. (I no longer have a MortgageIt Rep since they laid off their staff and shut down their local office in Bellevue). However, if I had transactions locked or approved with this company, you could see how I would have very little time to react for those transactions.

Just a sign of the current mortgage landscape.

If March begins roaring as a lion (as it seems so far), I do hope we go out as a lamb as far as our industry is concerned and that this is another “knee jerk” reaction and not a trend we see with other banks. Fannie Flex, MyCommunity and HomePossible have been great programs for many home owners.

Street of Dreams is on Fire

It’s very, very sad to watch. The news is showing pictures of the Street of Dreams homes in or near Woodinville up in flames. It’s a massive fire.

Apparently none were occupied homes, so no one was hurt as far as I can tell so far.

Unbelievably it appears that the group taking credit for the arson activity is an “Eco-Terrorist” group of some kind. Not Built Green enough apparently, and the penalty is they have been destroyed.

I find this very, very hard to believe, but Kim tells me that it is not the first time he has seen this kind of activity in the Pacific Northwest. Apparently there are stories of this type of arson going back for decades and as recent as 2004 in Snohomish County.

Talk about giving “tree-huggers” a bad name…astounding.

Having second thoughts about that High-End Condo presale?

As with any blog, this is not legal advice. If you want legal advice, consult an attorney in your area.

Escala. 1521 second avenue. Olive 8. Just a few of the many luxury, high-end condominiums going up in the Emerald City. Needless to say, when its “designed exclusively for the confident few,” you can be sure there will be a stiff price of admission. Indeed, these developers not only charge a high price, they also typically require a substantial earnest money deposit, usually 5% of the purchase price. On a million dollar condo, thats $50k. You’ll pony up this sum months, and even years, before the condo is complete and ready to close.

So what happens if you change your mind between the time you signed the presale contract and when the closing date approaches? What happens if the market goes in the tank and you want out of the deal? Or you foolishly went long on a can’t-miss investment opportunity, and now you’re not so sure you’re one of the “confident few”? Can you get your money back?

The short answer is “no.” Developers typically structure their contracts so that the earnest money will be forfeited if the buyer does not close. Buyers backing out of the deal is every developer’s nightmare — they need to sell the units and move on to the next project. Accordingly, developers do everything they can to “lock in” a buyer.

That said, there are typically a few avenues of attack if you really want out of the deal. To determine whether you are really serious about getting out of the deal (versus typical “buyer’s remorse”), ask yourself: “What would be worse, buying this condo or losing my earnest money?” If buying the condo is the worst possible outcome, worse even than losing your earnest money, then you’re ready to head for the exits.

One fertile area of inquiry is the Public Offering Statement (POS). By law, the seller of a new condo must provide the buyer with POS, which contains a variety of information about the condo development. Upon receipt, the buyer has a 7 day right of rescission and can therefore rescind the contract within that period with a full return of the earnest money. The seller must also provide the buyer with “all material amendments” to the POS, and upon receipt the buyer has another right of rescission if the “purchaser would have that right under generally applicable legal principles.”

Therein lies the rub, of course. These “generally applicable legal principles” are not spelled out in the statute, so it is a bit of an open question as to the extent of a change in the POS (between when provided to the buyer initially and when finalized) that gives rise to another right of rescission. Regardless, however, it creates an arguable point with attendant risk to all parties if they are unable to voluntarily resolve the dispute. Since every POS changes between the initial, presale version and the final version, a buyer can usually use these changes to negotiate at least a partial return of the earnest money.

There are other “arguable points” as well, all of which can lead to a negotiated resolution and a return of at least some of the money. Many developers are apparently unaware of the Interstate Land Sales Disclosure Act, a federal law that applies to large-scale developments. This statute has several requirements, including a disclosure requirement similar to the POS. If the seller fails to abide by the requirements of this federal statute, the buyer may have a right of rescission. There are many exceptions to this statue, but as long as there is some doubt, it will assist the buyer in negotiating a resolution.

In the final analysis, it is probably worth it to hire an attorney if there is a substantial amount of earnest money at issue (almost guaranteed if you’re talking about a luxury condo). The attorney will be able to identify those legal issues that can be used to negotiate a resolution. In doing so, you will probably get some of your earnest money back, and that total will probably be more than what you spent on attorney’s fees.

Major Changes with Appraisals for Conforming Loans

This morning it was announced from OFHEO that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have agreed to some major changes with regards to how appraisals will be ordered for conforming mortgages:

“…including eliminating broker-ordered appraisals, prohibiting appraiser coercion, and reducing the use of appraisals prepared in-house or through captive appraisal management companies in underwriting mortgages. The agreements also enhance quality control in the appraisal process and establish a complaint hotline for consumers. The agreements include a Home Valuation Code of Conduct that the Enterprises will apply to lenders selling mortgages to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The Code becomes effective on January 1, 2009.”

It’s ironic to me this is eliminating “broker-ordered” appraisals and “reducing the use of captive appraisal management companies” when it was Washington Mutual’s actions with eAppraisal that caused New York Attorney General Cuomo to investigate.

The appraiser I use has been doing his job for over 30 years. I trust him and respect his work. Last year, when he had an appraisal come in low on a property that was in a bidding war with zero down financing, I didn’t doubt him. The agents were furious…even the homebuyer wanted a new appraisal. They wound up buying the home for the appraised value instead of the bid-up price. I wonder if they realize what a favor he did for them by providing a true appraisal? (He’s come in low on some refi’s too). I have to admit, I’m less than happy realizing that I may not be able to rely on using his services for appraisals once the new guidelines go info effect.

I’m concerned that obtaining a conforming appraisal will be very similar to how VA appraisals are done: a crapshoot lottery. This is all well and good as long the appraisers in the pool are all competent and efficient. However when there is no competition for business, will it breed complacency?

I’m also wondering what will happen with the cost of appraisals. Presently, I have a rate sheet from my appraiser and I know how much the cost will be for each transaction after we have loan approval. Unless Fannie and Freddie decide to control what an appraiser will charge, the fees can vary. How will loan originators be able to provide accurate Good Faith Estimates without knowing who the appraisal will be through?

More questions than answers right now…and more changes with mortgages are on the horizon with HUD’s announcement of what the median home prices are due in about ten days.

Update: Fannie Mae is accepting comments until April 30, 2008.

Warning to Thurston County agents – and this goes for FSBO folks too…

February 25, 2008. The NWMLS has received information (Thurston County area) concerning a male individual who looked at homes with an agent — all of the information he provided about himself and his employment was false. He claims to be a buyer’s consultant with the Federal Government, a PhD in Physics, his wife a professor at the University of Washington and they live in Medina, WA. None of the information he provided, except his name, is correct.

The individual is a currently registered, Level 3 Sex Offender, male, about 54, white, 5’11″, about 220 pounds, gray/red hair, tattoos on each arm and may have a beard.

Other than providing false information during the preview of two homes, the individual did not demonstrate inappropriate behavior. Showing agent did not allow herself to be placed in a perilous situation. Individual has previously been a home inspector and appears to be familiar with the real estate industry.

Please be careful! If this man contacts you, contact your local authority.

This posting from the NWMLS came out a few days ago but I was out of town and didn’t see it till today. You can never be too safe when selling your home or acting as an agent to help someone buy or sell a house, so do be careful if you are contacted by a person matching this description.

Absorption Rates

As of last night there were 9,176 Residential Properties for sale in King County and 3,261 condos. I personally feel that calculating absorption rate is better done in smaller segments and not the entire County. But since many are trying to calculate the number of months of inventory for all of King County, I’ll throw my hat into the ring with my opinion on that.

Based on sales for the months of March through June of 2007, it would take 3.79 months to sell off the current inventory.

If single family home sales are down this year by about 30% compared to last year, and I think they are and will continue to be so, then that 3.79 months turns into 5.6 months.

So it would appear in my opinion that we currently have a full season’s worth of inventory on market. Another way to say that is: I predict that between March 1 of 2008 and August 20th or so, 9,176 homes will sell in King County, that being equal to the inventory as of March 2nd.

Now let’s do the condos.

3,261 on market. For the months of March, April and May of 2007 the avg. number of sales per month was 919. For the months of June, July and August of 2007, the avg. number of sales per month was 965. The average then for the six month period is 942. 3,261 divided by 942 sales would be 3.46 months if sales were not down. But if condo sales are going to be say 35% fewer, and I think that’s generous for a couple of reasons, then avg. monthly sales would drop from 942 to 612 per month increasing the absorption rate of current supply from 3.46 months to 5.3 months.

So let’s say it will take until mid-August to sell off 3,261 condos, which is equal to the current supply. That’s pretty much the same as my single famile home prediction.

One of the factors to consider if you are using absorption rates to determine how long it may take for you to sell your home is age. Any area that is competing with new construction may find a higher number of sales being new homes. If you have a home built in 2004 and your primary competition is a builder of new homes, the absorption rates may not help you if 60% or more of the purchases in your immediate vicinity represent people buying new construction vs. resale.

If all of the properties in your immediate vicinity are homes built between 1960 and 1980, and there is little or no new construction or newer homes, then the absorption statistics will be more helpful.

Identifying who your competition is, cannot be done on a County-wide basis. If you have a home near Microsoft, for example, better to use absorption rates calculated specifically for that area. If you have a lake view home, then it is a bit more difficult. Lake view buyers are more likely to look at other view homes and be more open to where. So looking too close to your home to calculate rate of absorption would not be as accurate.

In any event, it looks like we are starting the year in King County for both single family homes and condos at a full season’s worth of inventory. Remember that townhomes on the Eastside are likely to be included in the condo stats and townhomes in Seattle, particularly North Seattle, will most likely show in the Residential/SFH statistics. That is a function of how the land is and is not subdivided.