Tag Archives: buyer

Lynlee's Tips to maximize seller proceeds

Posted on by
Reply

[photopress:Lynee_Signing_1.JPG,thumb,alignright]

Photo to right: Lynlee Kane w/ clients

We frequently close transactions in which the buyer offers a higher price than the list price in exchange for the seller paying buyer closing costs. Most of the transactions of this type actually result in the seller netting less than if they accepted a full price offer without concessions. We recognize that many buyers are cash poor and need to have the seller pay closing costs.

When writing your contracts please consider that the higher price will result in the seller paying higher excise tax, real estate commissions, escrow fee and title premiums.

For example, a very common $10,000 seller concession (offset by increasing the sales price) will cost the seller $778 (6%, 1.78% excise) in excise tax and commissions alone.

Sellers usually do not consider these costs until they come to the closing table and actually review the numbers on the settlement statement. This obviously creates an awkward situation for the listing agent who may have told them it was a wash.

Over the year, we have documented only one case where the listing agent addressed the increase in excise tax via a commission credit. Only about half the time we receive addendums stating that commissions will be based upon the lower or original list price.

While assisting 100% financed borrowers with closing costs is helpful in making a sale, make certain your sellers understand that it may cost them more.

  • Consider Excise tax at 1.78% in most jurisdictions
  • Consider the additional commissions at 6%
  • Consider that title and escrow premium may also increase

Wishing you all the best in smooth closings!

How to Value a House

Posted on by
16

[photopress:bullseye.jpg,thumb,alignright]While “market value” and “appraised value” are not always one in the same, calculating a home’s value is both a science and an art, whether the value is being ascertained by an appraiser or a real estate professional.

The purpose of the valuation can actually have some bearing on the value itself. If you have a client who is purchasing a property to remodel and flip it, the value for that client has to take into consideration the cost of the improvements and the eventual resale value. Consequently, one has to be involved in both knowing, and making recommendations with regard to, which improvements will produce the greatest return, before the client makes an offer on the property.

Just as a lender has to take into consideration many factors when recommending various loan programs, a real estate professional has to take into account many factors before determining a home’s fair market value. When you are representing a seller, you have to lean towards the high end of the value range. An appraiser would call this “highest and best use”. A real estate agent would call that “if purchased by a person of the best buyer profile. For example, someone purchasing a property to live in it, will pay more for a property than a builder who is going to tear it down or an investor who is going to remodel and flip it.

When you represent the buyer, you have to consider the home’s resale value and any money left on the table by the seller. A seller leaves money on the table by various means that are generally not reflected in the asking price itself. I use this test when valuing a property for the buyer: If they called me in a very short period of time to sell it because they decided to move back from where they came from, could I get them out whole, meaning purchase price plus the costs of purchase and sale. By being a “listing agent” in your mind when representing a buyer, an agent will perform a better valuation than if they are just considering how much the buyer wants or likes the property. Of course, the buyer can always choose to pay more than that value and say “I don’t plan to sell it as I plan to live here for a very long time”, but they will at least know how much they are overpaying for the privelege of getting the home. Very important when the buyer is trying to determine the cap on their escalation clause.

Let’s go to the science part of the valuation. Some houses have what are called “true comps”. This would be most true in a very large community of newer homes. I am not going to spend a lot of time on valuing property with “true comps” because here in the Seattle Area, there are very, very few houses that can be valued by those normal methods. In fact the only ones I have been able to value by normal methods have been newer townhomes. Proximity to the subject property is not always relevant, especially in Seattle vs. Eastside. The comps have to be ones built in the same “finish period” and have the same “buyer profile”. For instance, a property built in 1991 may have white cabinets, gray countertops, white appliances and 4″ white tile in the baths. Using that as a comp to a property built in 1995 with granite tile countertops vs. gray laminate and maple cabinets vs. white cabinets, will not produce a reliable end result. Nor would using a comp with granite slab counters, stainless appliances and hardwood floors.

For the most part, we are lucky to find one recent sale that is quite similar to the property we are valuing. I call that the home’s “significant other”. An appraiser will still use three solds, whether similar or not, to ascertain value. A real estate agent will pull the significant other from the solds and move to properties that are pending and STI and ACTIVE in determining what a buyer will pay or should pay or what a seller should set as an asking price.

A few recent examples. When I valued a property for a seller back in May, I had comps of $325,000, $327,000 and $337,000. I priced the townhome at $350,000 and it sold for $350,000. The upward momentum of the marketplace from May was a significant factor. For this particular townhome, best buyer profile was someone who was relocating to the area and the buyer was in fact relocated here for her new job.

When I recently valued a newer townhome at this time of year, I needed to be more “right on target” as we are in a sluggish month of August aka “agents take vacation time month” and running into September which generally has two weeks out of four that are hot. The buyer profile of this particular townhome was a single person who would take in roommates. It did sell quickly and at full price to a student taking in two roommates. The danger on this one was pricing against new construction. You have to be as high as you can without encroaching on the price at which a buyer can get a brand new townhome nearby. I could not use the comps at all when valuing that property, because the subject property was built in 2001 and the comps were 2003 and new. The interior finishes were not comparable and could not compete, so to get a fast full price was their best chance of not having to bargain down to a level below the highest achievable price.

Let’s flip to buyers and how I value a property for a buyer vs. a seller. I’ll have to make this another article as the Vicodin for the root canal is kicking in and I’m going to barf.

Perhaps a buyer’s perspective…

Posted on by
120

Sometimes a comment is so darn good, it really should be a post.

Perhaps a buyer’s perspective might be useful here.

I don’t know jack about real estate. My husband and I have been burned in the past by a string of dishonest agents, most recently in January when we relocated to Seattle. We were so full of loathing for the industry in general that we seriously considered Redfin, simply because we had no hope of finding a “real person

What else is Zillow good for?

Posted on by
20

If your Zillow Zestimate is higher than what your home sells for, than you will likely have no trouble appraising for the buyer’s loan, AND you can let it bid up if you get multiple offers without fear that it will not appraise.

If the Zillow Zestimate is lower than what you are able to sell your house for…don’t count your money until after the appraiser leaves, and be sure to take the offer with the most money down, and the buyer who is willing to make up the difference between sale price and appraised value in cash.

Realtor APB: How to lose clients

Posted on by
2

In the Aug. 13th blog missive at Bloodhound Blog, Greg Swann discusses his recent experience with a client who he successfully helped with finding a new home. The twist was that the buyers he was working with had been working with another agent. As you can imagine, the other agent was frustrated and angry that they lost out on a sale. Find out how the other agent reacted by reading the story.

A few months ago I came across an excellent article in USA Today called “The waiter rule.” I shared it with all the professionals we work with. Several CEO’s of Fortune 500 companies were profiled in the article. The CEO’s would take a potential new hire (for an executive or management position) to lunch or dinner. The CEO’s would see how the recruit treated wait staff. The results were interesting and revealing. How you treat others (co-workers, support staff, allied professionals) in business relationships, however difficult or stressful, speaks volumes about your character and leadership in business.

One recent example played out in front of my wife who was signing a client. The client had questions regarding the transaction and called their loan officer. Everyone knows that if a cell phone is turned up loud enough you can hear the conversation loud and clear.

Unfortunately, for the loan officer, my wife heard every word: “…escrow does not know what the #%! they are talking about.” Not only did the comment embarrass the client, but it made us evaluate the working relationships we have with everyone we work with. Ouch.

Situational Values: How do you stack up?

Bill Swanson, CEO of Raytheon Corp. has this to say:

“Watch out for people who have situational value system, who can turn the charm on and off depending upon the status of the person they are interacting with. Be especially wary of those who are rude to people perceived to be in subordinate roles.”

ASBESTOS – Buyer Beware!!

Posted on by
47

[photopress:inspectors.jpg,thumb,alignright]I am just beside myself on the topic of home inspectors and asbestos. I don’t care how many inspectors want to tell me why inspectors aren’t “obligated” to call asbestos in the inspection, I will still keep saying: “You have GOT to be KIDDING me!!

I’ve seen more asbestos in homes in the Seattle area than in my entire career to date around the Country.

“Well Ardell, I know we both “think” that’s asbestos were looking at there, but we really can’t say it’s asbestos unless we send it out to a lab and have it tested. So we just have this disclaimer in our contract saying we are not responsible for calling asbestos in the inspection…and that is sufficient for US” US being the home inspectors!!

Yesterday I literally took a razor tool from the inspector and cut open some paneling held together by duct tape in a basement and forced an inspector to look behind it before he wrote “inaccessible area” on the report! I said if you don’t lend me something to do this with, I’m going to use my bare hands!

How come I can get 10 average Joe’s to stand around the asbestos wrapped pipes, who will all say “Yep, dats asbestis alright”, but I can’t get one inspector to note asbestos in a home inspection report?

Oh, and here’s the agent’s lovely comment (I represent the seller and she represents the buyer) “Not my problem. The buyer chose their inspector and if the inspector doesn’t tell him what he needs to know…that’s not my problem, is it?”

In PA inspectors included “testing for radon” by setting canisters in the house and sending them to the lab. They couldn’t see radon or taste it or smell it, but they didn’t put a disclaimer in their contract saying “Duh, Don’t Know”.

Here’s a clue, Risk Reduction equals every buyer KNOWING WHAT the heck they are buying!!, not 25 disclaimer and disclosure forms covering everyone’s butts in the industry! And they have the nerve to tell me that they don’t want me at the inspection because I make them look bad…Oh WELL!!

And if you stick that pointy metal thing and chunk away at the mortar between the bricks of my seller’s house one more time in some silly act of macho bravado, I’m going to take it out of your and and stick it where you don’t want it stuck.

Some days I want to be a waitress…

To Stephane, this entire post should be in bold AND all caps! I am heeding your advice. But if you tell me to stop using !!exclamation points!!, we’ll have to agree to disagree 🙂

Trying to Force the Seller’s Hand

Posted on by
Reply

[photopress:hand.jpg,thumb,alignright] If you are playing the game of “trying to force the seller’s hand”, you have to know how to play it right. It is not easy to force a seller to…anything. Regardless of who is right and who is wrong, if you can say there is a right and wrong to the situation, reality is what it is. If you want the house, and you are not the only one who wants the house, you have to stay “in PLAY”.

Two buyers have been “circling the wagon” for weeks. Offers have been presented to the seller, counters have gone back to the buyers. Back and forth, back and forth. Buyer Agent saying, “Did the seller look at the comps I gave you showing why the seller should?” “Well of course the seller has to fix this and fix that, remove this and add that”. Meanwhile the seller is just going about their business, day in and day out, waiting for the buyers to agree to their price and conditions.

Then along comes buyer number three. Buyer number one and buyer number two, who have had offers back and forth, know what the seller wants. So it seems only fair to tell buyer number three what the seller wants. Meanwhile buyer number two wants to submit an offer again, third time, for something less than they know the seller wants. I say, well you have two choices. You can bring an offer meeting the seller’s counter to you of a couple of weeks ago and beat buyer number three to the punch, OR you can hang back and wait to see what buyer number three does.

Buyer number two’s agent doesn’t want to bring an offer matching what the seller wants NOR wait until buyer number three makes their move on Saturday, so she brings an offer that she knows is LESS than what the seller wants and Tries To Force the Seller’s Hand”, by giving a very short response time. Bad move. You bring the seller an unacceptable offer and put a response time that is hours before buyer number three is scheduled to see the house. What happens. By trying to force the seller’s hand and make him respond before buyer number three sees the house, you are left out in the cold. Your offer is expired before the seller is going to respond. Buyer number three’s offer is accepted and your offer is a non-offer, because it expired before the seller was willing to look at it.

If you tell the seller they only have x amount of time to respond, and that timeframe does not match the seller’s schedule for some reason, your offer becomes invalid. Agent says “You COULD HAVE countered and just changed the date…” But why? Why would the seller risk countering an expired offer, when they have an acceptable and valid offer on the table? (agent’s answer is because she has worked long and hard and deserves…anytime the agent’s answer includes the agent in the picture…wrong answer – wrong thinking.)

If you are trying to force the seller’s hand by giving him a short wick, and putting a response time that is less than acceptable, you have to revise your offer and extend that date the second your response time passes. You have to keep your offer “in play”. By trying to force the seller’s hand…you can put yourself out of the game altogether, if you do not keep your dates running forward by submitting a new response time.

Buyers often think that the seller MUST respond, MUST counter. Not the case. No answer IS an answer. If you have no answer by the time your offer time expires…you have your answer. The answer is NO…try again.

When I was a teenager, my parents often didn’t want me to go to parties. So when I asked to go to a party, I didn’t demand an answer on the spot. I made my case for why I thought they should say yes, and then I left the room to give them time to talk it over and think about it. The fast answer was often no…I went to lots of parties 🙂

When you give the seller what he wants, you can try to demand a quick response. When you want the house for less than acceptable terms, you have to be willing to hang back, and you have to be willing to lose it, if the seller doesn’t meet your terms. You can’t bang your fist on the table and demand that you get the house for less. Presenting an unacceptable offer, and demanding a quick response, is like a kid throwing a tantrum…rarely works out for the best. And almost never works out for the best, when you know there are other interested buyers.

Time to get into 1st backup position.

A Rock’n Home

Posted on by
22

[photopress:sleepless_in_seattle.jpg,thumb,alignright]Just received this in my inbox and I’m clueless as to the answer.

I’ve searched through your site but I’m wondering if you have any advice on buying a houseboat in Seattle.

I’m looking to spend up to $220K plus moorage, but I know very little about how I finance these. I hear it’s complicated and requires a larger down payment.

Any advice?

Any Rain City Guide contributors and/or readers with Houseboat experience?

Why I do not support the use of Buyer Agency Agreements

Posted on by
38

[photopress:buyer.jpg,thumb,alignright] For many years I have been at loggerheads with most of my peers around the country, regarding the use or lack thereof, of Buyer Agency Agreements.

After eight years of “ad nauseum”, insider agent forum discussions on this topic, I continue to feel that buyers are most often, better off without them. Most often I am the only agent, in a forum of 28,000 agents, who does not support the use of buyer agency agreements. So maybe I am the “loggerhead” who refuses to “get it”.

The only time I will use them, and I have used them, is when there is a clear and present reason for the buyer to have one, that is of benefit to the buyer. Everything I do is on a case by case basis…everything…and must pass my smell test for being right for this client at this time, given the objectives of this client. Often I wish I didn’t impose that ethical standard on myself 🙂

I was one of the first agents to use a buyer agency contract in the area I worked in at the time. The buyer had a previous bankruptcy. Under the rules in play in that area at that time, I would need to disclose the previous bankruptcy to the listing agent, even though it had no potential negative impact on the seller, as it did not affect this buyer’s ability to secure a loan. The only way I could get around this, was to explain this to the buyer and have them sign a buyer agency agreement. They agreed, we signed it, and the buyer got both the loan and the house. Some disagree with me on this and feel the seller has a right to know everything about the buyer, regardless of whether or not it will impact the seller. I do not agree.

Today, in this area, I do not need a contract with the buyer to represent the buyer, but at that time and in that place I did, so I used one in that particular case. I used one because the buyer could not attain their objective, buying that house, unless I did use one. It passed my smell test of being better for the buyer client for me to use a written buyer agency agreement.

Some of my peers argue/ask, “Why do you always use a contract with a SELLER client?” as if the issues are one in the same…a “contract is a contract” is their mantra. I always use a contract with a seller, because it is in the best interest of the seller to have all of the members of the mls show the seller’s property. In order for the seller to gain access to the mls, the sellers must sign a written agreement to pay, through me, the agent who shows the property and brings an acceptable and accepted offer. In other words…it passes my smell test for being best for my client for my client to sign it.

Is it a Buyer’s Market or a Seller’s Market?

Posted on by
4

We are, for the most part, in a “normal market”, meaning that in some segments, it is a Seller’s Market, while in another segment, in the same city and price range, it is a balanced to Buyer’s Market. I used this sample to show how, in a small geographic area and price range, you can have two types of markets going on simultaneously.

What does that mean to you as a buyer? If you find one in the charted area that shows 0 available and 24 sold in six months, you need to act quickly and be less picky about condition and location. If you find one in the area that has 15 available and 149 sold in the last six months (same City and same Price Range, different Zip Code) then you can take your time, be more picky and even wait for a better one.

What does that mean to you as a seller? If you are putting your property on market in the first graph area and price, you can likely push the price based on supply and demand and still sell quickly at full price. If you are a seller in the second market segment noted by the second graph, you will have more competition and should price competitively and put the property in the best showing condition possible.

I have not highlighted the true “Buyer’s Market” segment, which is one where only 3-5 of every 10 homes for sale, will sell at all, meaning the ratio is 10 sellers for every 3-5 buyers. That is occuring in higher price ranges (over $1,500,000) and harder to define market segments, and not necessarily as relevant to the average RCG reader.

Perhaps other agents who work further out, like Sultan, Monroe, Des Moines, etc… can do some stats in those areas for us. Anyone seeing the ratio of buyers to sellers such that there are not enough buyers in the marketplace to absorb current inventory in a reasonable timeframe?